Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Cybertech Software and Services Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.

Cybertech Software and Services vs Commr. of C. Ex.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Sep 15, 2004
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/36522

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Other Taxes

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Other Taxes

Key legal issue
Other Taxes

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Cybertech Software and Services

Respondent

Commr. of C. Ex.

Legal References

Reported In
(2006)2STR219

Excerpt

1. heard both sides. it is seen that the stay has been sought against the order dated 7-5-2004 passed by the commissioner remanding the matter to the asst. commissioner to quantify the service tax and take necessary action to recover the same by the process of law.2. the id. jdr submitted that the amount is not quantified. stay petition is not maintainable.3. after hearing both sides, we find that since the amount is yet to be quantified, there is no case for stay.4. we, therefore, dismiss the stay petition filed by the appellant as being pre-mature.

Full Judgment

1. Heard both sides. It is seen that the stay has been sought against the Order dated 7-5-2004 passed by the Commissioner remanding the matter to the Asst. Commissioner to quantify the service tax and take necessary action to recover the same by the process of law.

2. The Id. JDR submitted that the amount is not quantified. Stay petition is not maintainable.

3. After hearing both sides, we find that since the amount is yet to be quantified, there is no case for stay.

4. We, therefore, dismiss the stay petition filed by the appellant as being pre-mature.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial