Full Judgment
2. We heard Shri P M Panwar, learned Consultant, for the Appellants and Shri H C Verma, learned DR for the Respondent. The Appellants manufacture a number of excisable goods which are removed by them on payment of duty. They also undertake job work from M/s. Hi-Tech Gears Ltd. who after carrying out certain other processes cleare those goods on payment of duty. The department has disallowed the Modvat Credit of the duty paid on inputs like rubricating and cutting oils on the ground that these inputs have been used in the manufacture of exempted goods.
It has been contended by the Appellants that the goods which are processed by them on job work basis and in respect of which these inputs are used are not exempted goods as the principal manufacturer i.e. Hi-Tech Gears Ltd. cleare these goods on payment of duty from their factory. The issue involved in this matter is no more-res-integra as it has been settled by the Appellate Tribunal in the case of Jindal Polymers v. CCE, Meerut-2001(135) ELT 657 (Tribunal) wherein the Tribunal has held that the requirement of Notification No. 214/86-CE is that the final product should be those on which duty of Excise is leviable and the chain of credit has to be extended to the stage of clearance of the finished goods by the principal manufacturer on payment of duty. The Appellate Tribunal has relied upon the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Bajaj Tempo v. CCE-1994 (69) ELT 122. This decision has also been followed by the Tribunal in the case of Shakti Insulated Wires Ltd. v. CCE & C, Mumbai-IV-2002 (145) ELT 668.
Following these decisions we set aside the impugned Order and allow the appeal.