Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Cotmac Electronics (P) Ltd. Vs. Cce

Cotmac Electronics (P) Ltd. vs Cce

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Jun 08, 2004
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/35549

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Excise

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Excise

Key legal issue
Excise

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Cotmac Electronics (P) Ltd.

Respondent

Cce

Legal References

Reported In
(2004)(116)LC768Tri(Mum.)bai

Excerpt

1. the issue in dispute, namely, classification of uninterrupted power supply systems and control panels, is no longer res integra as it has been settled by the decision of the larger bench of the tribunal in the case of luminous electronics pvt. ltd. v. cce, new delhi holding that ups system fall for classification under chapter heading 85.04, and not under heading 85.43 of the schedule to the ceta, 1985. the assessee's plea is for classification under heading 85.04. following the larger bench decision, which has been approved by the supreme court in civil appeal no. 342/2002, we set aside the order of classification under heading 85.43 and allow the appeal.

Full Judgment

1. The issue in dispute, namely, classification of uninterrupted power supply systems and control panels, is no longer res integra as it has been settled by the decision of the larger bench of the Tribunal in the case of Luminous Electronics Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE, New Delhi holding that UPS system fall for classification under Chapter Heading 85.04, and not under heading 85.43 of the Schedule to the CETA, 1985. The assessee's plea is for classification under heading 85.04. Following the larger bench decision, which has been approved by the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 342/2002, we set aside the order of classification under heading 85.43 and allow the appeal.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial