Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. the Great Oasis Enterprises (P)

Commissioner of Central Excise vs The Great Oasis Enterprises (P)

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Jun 04, 2004
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/35510

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Excise

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Excise

Key legal issue
Excise

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Commissioner of Central Excise

Respondent

The Great Oasis Enterprises (P)

Excerpt

.....clearance of biscuits falling under chapter 19 of the schedule to the ceta, 1985 on behalf of m/s. britannia industries ltd., availed of credit paid on inputs under the modvat scheme. during the course of visit of central excise officers to their factory on 10/02/1996, excess of finished goods in bsr as compared to rg1 balance was detected.shortage on stock of inputs was also detected. it was also found that the respondents were clearing burnt/broken biscuits called "floor sweepings" and "dirty dough" without payment of duty/reversal of proportionate modvat credit. unaccounted excess stock of finished goods lying in bsr, floor sweepings and dirty dough were seized under panchnama. statements of employees of the assessee as well as m/s.britannia industries limited were recorded. show cause notice dated 17/05/1996 was issued proposing recovery of rs. 46,64,476/- (rs. 45,23,917/- in respect of floor sweepings and dirty dough and rs. 1,33,555/- on inputs found short), confiscation of seized goods and imposition of penalty.2. vide impugned order the commissioner dropped the demand on dirty dough and floor sweepings, confirmed the demand on inputs found short, confiscated seized biscuits with option to redeem on payment of fine of rs. 20,000/- and imposed penalty of rs. 30,000/- on the respondents. in the present appeal the revenue challenges the dropping of the duty demand on dirty dough and floor sweepings and release of 36 boxes of these goods.3. we have heard both sides. we find that identical issue had come up for decision in the case of britannia industries ltd. v. cce, bombay 1997 (93) elt 719 wherein the tribunal set aside the demand on dry waste consisting of spilled raw material such as flour, sugar, etc., and also under-baked and over-baked biscuits which were thrown on the ground, holding that these were waste and scrap and hence not excisable, even though the flour sweepings were purchased by dairy owners. in the present case the commissioner has relied.....

Full Judgment

1. The respondents herein, who are registered for manufacture and clearance of biscuits falling under Chapter 19 of the Schedule to the CETA, 1985 on behalf of M/s. Britannia Industries Ltd., availed of credit paid on inputs under the modvat scheme. During the course of visit of Central Excise officers to their factory on 10/02/1996, excess of finished goods in BSR as compared to RG1 balance was detected.

Shortage on stock of inputs was also detected. It was also found that the respondents were clearing burnt/broken biscuits called "floor sweepings" and "dirty dough" without payment of duty/reversal of proportionate modvat credit. Unaccounted excess stock of finished goods lying in BSR, floor sweepings and dirty dough were seized under panchnama. Statements of employees of the assessee as well as M/s.

Britannia Industries Limited were recorded. Show cause notice dated 17/05/1996 was issued proposing recovery of Rs. 46,64,476/- (Rs. 45,23,917/- in respect of floor sweepings and dirty dough and Rs. 1,33,555/- on inputs found short), confiscation of seized goods and imposition of penalty.

2. Vide impugned order the Commissioner dropped the demand on dirty dough and floor sweepings, confirmed the demand on inputs found short, confiscated seized biscuits with option to redeem on payment of fine of Rs. 20,000/- and imposed penalty of Rs. 30,000/- on the respondents. In the present appeal the Revenue challenges the dropping of the duty demand on dirty dough and floor sweepings and release of 36 boxes of these goods.

3. We have heard both sides. We find that identical issue had come up for decision in the case of Britannia Industries Ltd. v. CCE, Bombay 1997 (93) ELT 719 wherein the Tribunal set aside the demand on dry waste consisting of spilled raw material such as flour, sugar, etc., and also under-baked and over-baked biscuits which were thrown on the ground, holding that these were waste and scrap and hence not excisable, even though the flour sweepings were purchased by dairy owners. In the present case the Commissioner has relied upon the above cited decision to drop the proceedings on the burnt and broken biscuits. Following the ratio of the above order, which is squarely applicable to the present case, we are of the view that no interference with the Commissioner's order dropping the demand on floor sweepings and dirty dough is called for and hence uphold the order and reject the appeal.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial