Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Kada S.S.K. Ltd.

Commissioner of Central Excise vs Kada S.S.K. Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided May 11, 2004
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/35213

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue
MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Commissioner of Central Excise

Respondent

Kada S.S.K. Ltd.

Legal References

Reported In
(2004)(170)ELT471Tri(Mum.)bai

Excerpt

1. revenue is in appeal on valuation of molasses sold by lender, should have been cleared on basis of costing when captively consumed or sold by tender and the vasant dada sugar institute, pune's chief sugar technologist has stated that cost of many action of molasses without adding any overheads is rs. 852/- pmt and valuation in this case should be rs. 1,000/- pmt.2. commissioner (appeals) has found that it is not the revenues case that the price at which molasses were sold was not genuine, and once genuine sale price is available, comparable goods price can not be applied.3. sale by tender, if the lender system is not found fault with would be contract prices and contract prices for sale are acceptable under section 4(1)(a) value. when contracts between principal-to-principal and not otherwise impugned. these sales do not therefore require rule 6 of valuation rules determinations as proposed. nothing arises is found in the impugned order of commissioner of central excise (appeals). the same is to be upheld and revenue's appeal dismissed.

Full Judgment

1. Revenue is in appeal on valuation of molasses sold by lender, should have been cleared on basis of costing when captively consumed or sold by tender and the Vasant Dada Sugar Institute, Pune's Chief Sugar Technologist has stated that cost of many action of molasses without adding any overheads is Rs. 852/- PMT and valuation in this case should be Rs. 1,000/- PMT.2. Commissioner (Appeals) has found that it is not the Revenues case that the price at which molasses were sold was not genuine, and once genuine sale price is available, comparable goods price can not be applied.

3. Sale by tender, if the lender system is not found fault with would be contract prices and contract prices for sale are acceptable under Section 4(1)(a) value. When contracts between principal-to-principal and not otherwise impugned. These sales do not therefore require Rule 6 of Valuation Rules determinations as proposed. Nothing arises is found in the impugned order of Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals). The same is to be upheld and Revenue's appeal dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial