Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ranjan Grover Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Ranjan Grover vs Commissioner of Central Excise

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Apr 29, 2004
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/35114

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Excise

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Excise

Key legal issue
Excise

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ranjan Grover

Respondent

Commissioner of Central Excise

Legal References

Reported In
(2004)(170)ELT167TriDel

Excerpt

2. appellants filed this appeal challenging the imposition of penalty of rs. 1,71,077/-.3. brief facts of the case are that appellants are engaged in the manufacture of latex foam products and were availing the benefit of small scale exemption notification. during the verification of their accounts, the appellants found that they had crossed the limit of clearance provided under the small scale exemption notification and vide letter dated 20-1-2000 wrote to the revenue department regarding their clearance and deposited the amount of rs. 3,52,285/-, thereafter, revenue issued a show cause notice on 5-12-2000 asking for the duty in respect of the goods which were cleared over and above the value of clearance under the small scale exemption notification. as per the revenue, the appellants were required to pay an amount of rs. 4,51,185/-, the appellants accepted the demand and deposited the whole of the duty.4. the contention of the appellants is that when they had their own deposited the amount of rs. 3,52,285/- on the ground that they had cleared the goods over and above small scale exemption notification, there is no intention on their part to evade duty. the show cause notice was issued after almost one year from the date when they informed the department after depositing the duty.5. the contention of the revenue is that they had not deposited whole of the duty. the appellants deposited the amount of rs. 3,52,285/- whereas the total duty comes to rs. 4,51,185/-. the factual position is that appellants at their own vide letter dated 20-1-2000 deposited the duty of rs. 3,52,285 - has not disputed by the revenue. as the appellants, on verification from their record deposited the duty and, thereafter, on receipt of this information, the revenue issued show cause notice, in these circumstances, no mens rea to evade duty can be attributed to the appellants. in these circumstances, i find the imposition of penalty under section 11ac of the central excise act is not.....

Full Judgment

2. Appellants filed this appeal challenging the imposition of penalty of Rs. 1,71,077/-.

3. Brief facts of the case are that appellants are engaged in the manufacture of Latex Foam products and were availing the benefit of Small Scale Exemption Notification. During the verification of their accounts, the appellants found that they had crossed the limit of clearance provided under the Small Scale Exemption Notification and vide letter dated 20-1-2000 wrote to the Revenue Department regarding their clearance and deposited the amount of Rs. 3,52,285/-, Thereafter, Revenue issued a show cause notice on 5-12-2000 asking for the duty in respect of the goods which were cleared over and above the value of clearance under the Small Scale Exemption Notification. As per the Revenue, the appellants were required to pay an amount of Rs. 4,51,185/-, The appellants accepted the demand and deposited the whole of the duty.

4. The contention of the appellants is that when they had their own deposited the amount of Rs. 3,52,285/- on the ground that they had cleared the goods over and above Small Scale Exemption Notification, there is no intention on their part to evade duty. The show cause notice was issued after almost one year from the date when they informed the Department after depositing the duty.

5. The contention of the Revenue is that they had not deposited whole of the duty. The appellants deposited the amount of Rs. 3,52,285/- whereas the total duty comes to Rs. 4,51,185/-. The factual position is that appellants at their own vide letter dated 20-1-2000 deposited the duty of Rs. 3,52,285 - has not disputed by the Revenue. As the appellants, on verification from their record deposited the duty and, thereafter, on receipt of this information, the Revenue issued show cause notice, in these circumstances, no mens rea to evade duty can be attributed to the appellants. In these circumstances, I find the imposition of penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act is not sustainable, hence set aside. The appeal is allowed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial