Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Manikgarh Cement

Commissioner of Central Excise vs Manikgarh Cement

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Apr 05, 2004
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/34854

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Excise

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Excise

Key legal issue
Excise

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Commissioner of Central Excise

Respondent

Manikgarh Cement

Excerpt

1. the revenue challenges the findings of the commissioner of central excise in extending modvat credit on electrical equipment and appliances, and machinery and parts thereof which take part in carrying out various processes necessary for completion of manufacture of the respondents' final product, viz. cement and clinker.2. on hearing both sides, we note that electrical equipment and appliances have already been held to be eligible to be capital goods under rule 57q by virtue of the tribunal's larger bench decision in jawahar mills ltd. vs. cce, coimbatore 1999 (108) elt 47 which has been upheld by the supreme court in 2001 (132) elt 13 (sc). we therefore uphold the commissioner's order extending credit of rs. 1,55,580/- availed on these goods.3. as far as machinery and parts thereof are concerned, we find that there is no dispute that they take part in carrying out various processes necessary for completing the manufacture of cement and clinker, as seen from the show cause notice itself. the revenue's contention before us is that the goods do not play a direct role in completion of manufacture of the final product. it has already been held by the tribunal in the case of jawahar mills ltd. cited supra that direct involvement or direct nexus is not required and what is required is that the goods must be used in the manufacture of final product. we therefore hold that the commissioner has rightly allowed credit of rs. 14,67,157/- on these items.

Full Judgment

1. The revenue challenges the findings of the Commissioner of Central Excise in extending modvat credit on electrical equipment and appliances, and machinery and parts thereof which take part in carrying out various processes necessary for completion of manufacture of the respondents' final product, viz. cement and clinker.

2. On hearing both sides, we note that electrical equipment and appliances have already been held to be eligible to be capital goods under Rule 57Q by virtue of the Tribunal's larger bench decision in Jawahar Mills Ltd. vs. CCE, Coimbatore 1999 (108) ELT 47 which has been upheld by the supreme Court in 2001 (132) ELT 13 (SC). We therefore uphold the Commissioner's order extending credit of Rs. 1,55,580/- availed on these goods.

3. As far as machinery and parts thereof are concerned, we find that there is no dispute that they take part in carrying out various processes necessary for completing the manufacture of cement and clinker, as seen from the show cause notice itself. The Revenue's contention before us is that the goods do not play a direct role in completion of manufacture of the final product. It has already been held by the Tribunal in the case of Jawahar Mills Ltd. cited supra that direct involvement or direct nexus is not required and what is required is that the goods must be used in the manufacture of final product. We therefore hold that the Commissioner has rightly allowed credit of Rs. 14,67,157/- on these items.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial