Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Industrial Oxygen Co. Ltd.

Commissioner of Central Excise vs industrial Oxygen Co. Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Mar 17, 2004
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/34607

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Commissioner of Central Excise

Respondent

industrial Oxygen Co. Ltd.

Legal References

Reported In
(2004)(169)ELT118Tri(Mum.)bai

Excerpt

1. revenue is in appeal pleading to deny the exemption to oxygen storage tanks installed in the respondents' plant as a component on the grounds that the tanks on classification under heading 73.11.00 which is a heading not covered under the table of capital goods.2. heard both sides and after consideration of the use and an finding that the tanks are essential components of the appellants plant and machinery. relying upon cbec's departments circular no. 27/10/96-tru, dated 2-12-1996 wherein para 4 reads as - "accordingly it is clarified that all parts, components, accessories, which are to be used with capital goods of clauses (a) to (c) of explanation (1) of rule 57q and classifiable under any chapter heading are eligible for availment of modvat credit." no merits are found in this appeal to set aside eligibility of the credit allowed.

Full Judgment

1. Revenue is in appeal pleading to deny the exemption to Oxygen Storage Tanks installed in the respondents' Plant as a component on the grounds that the tanks on classification under Heading 73.11.00 which is a heading not covered under the Table of capital goods.

2. Heard both sides and after consideration of the use and an finding that the Tanks are essential components of the appellants plant and machinery. Relying upon CBEC's departments Circular No. 27/10/96-TRU, dated 2-12-1996 wherein Para 4 reads as - "Accordingly it is clarified that all parts, components, accessories, which are to be used with capital goods of Clauses (a) to (c) of Explanation (1) of Rule 57Q and classifiable under any Chapter heading are eligible for availment of Modvat credit." No merits are found in this appeal to set aside eligibility of the credit allowed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial