Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Jit Singh Vs. Maharaj Singh

Jit Singh vs Maharaj Singh

Disposition Appeal dismissed Court Mumbai Decided Nov 01, 1911
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/342989

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Mumbai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Property
Disposition
Appeal dismissed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Practice -Privy Council-Presh point.;It is not usual to allow a point to be raised on appeal to the Privy Council which has not been discussed in the Court below, and upon which their Lordships have not got the assistance of the Court below. -

Key legal issue
Property
Outcome / disposition
Appeal dismissed

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jit Singh

Respondent

Maharaj Singh

Legal References

Reported In
(1912)14BOMLR30

Excerpt

practice -privy council-presh point.;it is not usual to allow a point to be raised on appeal to the privy council which has not been discussed in the court below, and upon which their lordships have not got the assistance of the court below. - macnaghten, j.1. it is not usual to allow a point to be raised here on appeal which has not been discussed in the court below, and upon which their lordships have not got the assistance of the court below.2. oh this ground their lordships will humbly advise his majesty that this appeal should be dismissed.

Full Judgment

Macnaghten, J.

1. It is not usual to allow a point to be raised here on appeal which has not been discussed in the Court below, and upon which their Lordships have not got the assistance of the Court below.

2. Oh this ground their Lordships will humbly advise His Majesty that this appeal should be dismissed.

Continue Your Research

Same Parties Jit Singh vs Maharaj Singh Same Subject Property Same Judge Macnaghten, J.
Property

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales