Bharti Sons Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Bharti Sons vs Commissioner of Central Excise

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Oct 24, 2003

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/32780

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/32780
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge: P Chacko
Decided On: Oct 24, 2003
Subject: Customs

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Customs

Key legal issue: Customs

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bharti Sons

Respondent

Commissioner of Central Excise

Legal References

Reported In: (2004)(166)ELT178TriDel

Excerpt

.....jalandhar. notification no. 16/02 was amended by notification no. 78/02-cus. (n.t.), dated 5-12-2002, whereby the commissioner of customs (appeals), jalandhar lost jurisdiction to deal with the appeals arising within the jurisdiction of commissioner of customs (preventive), amritsar, the impugned order was passed on 30-7-2003, when the commissioner of customs, jalandhar had no jurisdiction to deal with the appeal of the party. at that time, the jurisdiction was with the commissioner of customs (appeals), delhi-i in terms of sr. no. (1) of the table annexed to notification no, 16/02-cus. (n.t.), dated 7-3-2002 (as amended). no other notification affecting the jurisdiction of commissioner of customs (appeals), delhi-i has been brought to my notice. in the result, it is found that the appeal preferred against the decision order dated 28-9-2000 of the deputy commissioner of customs, cfs, ludhiana has been entertained without jurisdiction by the commissioner of customs (appeals), jalandhar on 30-7-2003. consequently, the impugned order is set aside and the commissioner of customs (appeals), delhi-i is directed to deal with the appeal of the party in terms of sr. no. (1) of the table annexed to notification no. 16/02-cus, (nt.), dated 7-3-2002 (as amended). the appeal on the file of the commissioner of customs (appeals), jalandhar shall be transferred to the file of his counterpart at delhi-i.

Full Judgment

1. It appears from the records and the submissions mode by both the sides that the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Jalandhar had no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal of the party when he passed the impugned order dated 30-7-2003. Apparently, when the appeal was filed on 5th of December, 2000, the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Jalandhar had jurisdiction to entertain the appeal under Notification No. 29/97-Cus. (N.T.), dated 7-7-1997 of the Control Government. The said notification was superseded by Notification No. 16/02-Cus. (N.T.), dated 7-3-2002 without affecting the jurisdiction of the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Jalandhar. Notification No. 16/02 was amended by Notification No. 78/02-Cus. (N.T.), dated 5-12-2002, whereby the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Jalandhar lost jurisdiction to deal with the appeals arising within the jurisdiction of Commissioner of Customs (Preventive), Amritsar, The impugned order was passed on 30-7-2003, when the Commissioner of Customs, Jalandhar had no jurisdiction to deal with the appeal of the party. At that time, the jurisdiction was with the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Delhi-I in terms of Sr. No. (1) of the table annexed to Notification No, 16/02-Cus. (N.T.), dated 7-3-2002 (as amended). No other notification affecting the jurisdiction of Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Delhi-I has been brought to my notice. In the result, it is found that the appeal preferred against the decision order dated 28-9-2000 of the Deputy Commissioner of Customs, CFS, Ludhiana has been entertained without jurisdiction by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Jalandhar on 30-7-2003. Consequently, the impugned order is set aside and the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Delhi-I is directed to deal with the appeal of the party in terms of Sr. No. (1) of the table annexed to Notification No. 16/02-Cus, (NT.), dated 7-3-2002 (as amended). The appeal on the file of the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Jalandhar shall be transferred to the file of his counterpart at Delhi-I.

Same Court & Year Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delh... Same Parties Bharti Sons vs Commissioner of Central Excise Same Subject Customs Same Judge P Chacko