Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Jaybee Lamination Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Jaybee Lamination Ltd. vs Commissioner of C. Ex.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Jul 28, 2003
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/31734

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Customs

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Customs

Key legal issue
Customs

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jaybee Lamination Ltd.

Respondent

Commissioner of C. Ex.

Legal References

Reported In
(2003)(158)ELT292TriDel

Excerpt

2. applicants filed this application for waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty. the demand was confirmed on the ground that the applicants have shown more wastage than prescribed in the exim policy. applicants availed the benefit of notification 17/2001-cus. and in that notification there is no condition regarding percentage of waste.therefore, prima facie, applicants have a strong case. the pre-deposit of duty and penalty is waived. adjourned to 18-9-2003 for arguments.

Full Judgment

2. Applicants filed this application for waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty. The demand was confirmed on the ground that the applicants have shown more wastage than prescribed in the Exim Policy. Applicants availed the benefit of Notification 17/2001-Cus. and in that notification there is no condition regarding percentage of waste.

Therefore, prima facie, applicants have a strong case. The pre-deposit of duty and penalty is waived. Adjourned to 18-9-2003 for arguments.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial