Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Jindal Strips Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Jindal Strips vs Commissioner of Central Excise

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Apr 03, 2003
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/30531

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Excise

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Excise

Key legal issue
Excise

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jindal Strips

Respondent

Commissioner of Central Excise

Legal References

Reported In
(2003)(156)ELT918Tri(Mum.)bai

Excerpt

1. the above appeals arise out of two common impugned order and are hence heard together and disposed of by this common order.2. the appellants herein are engaged in the manufacture of c.r. coils etc. modvat credit has been disallowed on several items claimed to be capital goods. the ground for disallowing capital goods credit is that the items do not fall within the coverage of the explanation to rule 57q as capital goods.3. i have heard both sides. my findings on the various items are recorded as under :- (i) current transformer ratio : credit of rs. 10,450 has been denied on this item which is used for supplying required current to the rolling mill machinery. since the capacity was not the permitted capacity, i hold that the credit is not available on this item. (ii) float cum charger : credit of rs. 7860 has been denied on this item which is used to charge d.c. battery to supply d.c. power to d.c. motors of rolling mill. this is eligible capital goods being part of rolling mill machinery, applying the ratio of the decision of the tribunal in the case of nova udyog ltd, [1996 (88) e.l.t. 532] and century cements [1997 (95) e.l.t. 655]. (iii) r.c. snubber, capacitor : these are items which are parts of abb master system of rolling mills and used to carry electrical signals for timing/start up to the rolling mill equipments and the capacitor is used to trip the system/equipment in case of overload power supply. since these items are parts of rolling mill machinery, applying the ratio of the tribunal decision in the case of century cements cited supra and the decision in the case of vivek alloys ltd. [1998 (98) e.l.t. 156 (t)], i hold that the credit of rs. 6840 on these" two items is available. (iv) parts of plc : these items used to monitor and control the annealing operation of the goods are capital goods as they are component parts of programmed logical controller, applying the ratio of the tribunal's decision in the case of j.k. synthetics ltd. [1996 (88).....

Full Judgment

1. The above appeals arise out of two common impugned order and are hence heard together and disposed of by this common order.

2. The appellants herein are engaged in the manufacture of C.R. coils etc. Modvat credit has been disallowed on several items claimed to be capital goods. The ground for disallowing capital goods credit is that the items do not fall within the coverage of the explanation to Rule 57Q as capital goods.

3. I have heard both sides. My findings on the various items are recorded as under :- (i) Current Transformer ratio : Credit of Rs. 10,450 has been denied on this item which is used for supplying required current to the Rolling Mill Machinery. Since the capacity was not the permitted capacity, I hold that the credit is not available on this item.

(ii) Float cum charger : Credit of Rs. 7860 has been denied on this item which is used to charge D.C. Battery to supply D.C. power to D.C. Motors of Rolling Mill. This is eligible capital goods being part of Rolling Mill Machinery, applying the ratio of the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Nova Udyog Ltd, [1996 (88) E.L.T. 532] and Century Cements [1997 (95) E.L.T. 655].

(iii) R.C. Snubber, Capacitor : These are items which are parts of ABB Master System of Rolling Mills and used to carry electrical signals for timing/start up to the Rolling Mill Equipments and the capacitor is used to trip the system/equipment in case of overload power supply. Since these items are parts of Rolling Mill machinery, applying the ratio of the Tribunal decision in the case of Century Cements cited supra and the decision in the case of Vivek Alloys Ltd. [1998 (98) E.L.T. 156 (T)], I hold that the credit of Rs. 6840 on these" two items is available.

(iv) Parts of PLC : These items used to monitor and control the annealing operation of the goods are capital goods as they are component parts of Programmed Logical controller, applying the ratio of the Tribunal's decision in the case of J.K. Synthetics Ltd. [1996 (88) E.L.T. 785] and Jindal Polymers [1998 (103) E.L.T. 569 (T) = 1998 (25) RLT 838]. Therefore, I hold that credit of Rs. 25,334/- on this item is admissible.

(v) Sub-assembly of ABB Master System : Credit of Rs. 8542 has been disallowed on this item which is used for implementing specific functions such as start up/shut off, sequencing, timing to control various Cold Rolling machinery. Therefore, sub-assembly is capital goods eligible to credit as it is a part of ABB Master System in the light of the Tribunal's decision in the case of J.K. Synthetics Ltd. and Jindal Polymer cited supra.

(vi) Frequency Meter : Credit of Rs. 8004 has been denied on this item which is used to check the flow of HCL in pickling process of HR Coil. Since this item is process control equipment it is eligible to capital goods credit.

(vii) Circuit Breaker: Credit of Rs. 75,770.00 has been disallowed on this item which is used to provide the required volt of power to the machinery for operation of the same. In the light of the Tribunal's decision in the case of Modi Rubber Ltd. [1999 (114) E.L.T. 724] these are eligible to capital goods credit being used for disconnecting the circuit of machinery according to operational sequence to produce the final product.

4. In the result capital goods credit is held to be admissible to all items except Current Transformer ratio. Penalty of Rs. 6,000/- is set aside.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial