Full Judgment
2. None appears for the appellants in spite of notice. Hence I heard the ld. Departmental Representative Shri Uma Shankar and perused the records. The appellants have not put any material on record as to why the goods cannot be treated as consumer goods, while on the other hand, the Adjudicating Authority has given a clear finding that the goods can directly satisfy human needs and therefore, fall within the description of consumer goods. Since the goods are consumer goods they are not covered under OGL and required a specific import licence. Therefore, the licence produced by the importers has rightly been held not to be valid for the coverage of the import. Since the import is unauthorised, confiscation is sustainable as well as the penalty. I, therefore, uphold the impugned order and reject the appeal.