Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Kopran Ltd. Vs. Commr. of Customs

Kopran Ltd. vs Commr. of Customs

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Dec 17, 2002
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/29646

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Customs

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Customs

Key legal issue
Customs

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kopran Ltd.

Respondent

Commr. of Customs

Legal References

Reported In
(2003)(161)ELT214Tri(Mum.)bai

Excerpt

1. heard both sides. the issue relates to grant of exemption to dane salt required for manufacture of amoxycillin under notification no. 64, dated 6-3-1979. the notification required production of the certificate regarding receipt of imported goods in the manufacturing premises within a period of three months or such extended period allowed by the assistant collector. admittedly, the appellants have produced the certificate much beyond the period of three months. the case had travelled up to tribunal earlier and it was remanded to the collector (appeals) for fresh order on merits. however, we find that the commissioner (appeals) has again rejected the claim of the appellant stating that it is the jurisdiction of the earlier authority to accept delayed end use certificate and since the assistant commissioner was not satisfied with the reasons stated by the appellants for the delay, he has confirmed order of the assistant commissioner and rejected the appeal.2. we find that the order in original was passed before the appellants submitted the certificate and the assistant commissioner had no occasion to hear the appellants on the issue of delay in submission of the certificate. as such, we remand the matter to the assistant commissioner to consider the certificate submitted by the appellants and hear them on the reasons for delay in submitting the same before passing a fresh order. appeal is al-lowed by way of remand.

Full Judgment

1. Heard both sides. The issue relates to grant of exemption to Dane Salt required for manufacture of Amoxycillin under Notification No. 64, dated 6-3-1979. The Notification required production of the certificate regarding receipt of imported goods in the manufacturing premises within a period of three months or such extended period allowed by the Assistant Collector. Admittedly, the appellants have produced the certificate much beyond the period of three months. The case had travelled up to Tribunal earlier and it was remanded to the Collector (Appeals) for fresh order on merits. However, we find that the Commissioner (Appeals) has again rejected the claim of the appellant stating that it is the jurisdiction of the earlier authority to accept delayed end use certificate and since the Assistant Commissioner was not satisfied with the reasons stated by the appellants for the delay, he has confirmed order of the Assistant Commissioner and rejected the appeal.

2. We find that the order in original was passed before the appellants submitted the certificate and the Assistant Commissioner had no occasion to hear the appellants on the issue of delay in submission of the certificate. As such, we remand the matter to the Assistant Commissioner to consider the certificate submitted by the appellants and hear them on the reasons for delay in submitting the same before passing a fresh order. Appeal is al-lowed by way of remand.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial