Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Bata India Ltd. Vs. C.C.E.

Bata India Ltd. vs C.C.E.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Sep 26, 1986
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/2869

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Excise

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Excise

Key legal issue
Excise

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bata India Ltd.

Respondent

C.C.E.

Legal References

Reported In
(1986)(10)ECC209

Excerpt

order nos. 403 and 404/86-a dated 29-5-1986 in appeal no. ed/sb/t200/77-a and appeal no. ed/sb/t536/81-a 1. in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of section 35c of the central excises and salt act, 1944, the tribunal hereby makes the following rectification in the aforesaid. order: in place of the sentence: "only question to be answered is whether both bata and bsc goods are 'such goods' as bata brand goods and whether the affixing of brand name amounts to manufacture to make the goods as being of different category", in paragraph 8, the following shall be substituted: only question to be answered is whether both bata and bsc goods are different and whether the affixing of brand name amounts to manufacture to make the goods as being of different category.

Full Judgment

ORDER Nos. 403 and 404/86-A dated 29-5-1986 in Appeal No. ED/SB/T200/77-A and Appeal No. ED/SB/T536/81-A 1. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (2) of Section 35C of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, the Tribunal hereby makes the following rectification in the aforesaid. Order: In place of the sentence: "Only question to be answered is whether both Bata and BSC goods are 'such goods' as Bata brand goods and whether the affixing of brand name amounts to manufacture to make the goods as being of different category", in paragraph 8, the following shall be substituted: Only question to be answered is whether both Bata and BSC goods are different and whether the affixing of brand name amounts to manufacture to make the goods as being of different category.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial