Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Doom Polymers Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Doom Polymers Ltd. vs Commissioner of C. Ex.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Apr 10, 2002
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/27989

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Excise

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Excise

Key legal issue
Excise

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Doom Polymers Ltd.

Respondent

Commissioner of C. Ex.

Legal References

Reported In
(2002)(146)ELT73TriDel

Excerpt

1. the applicants filed this application for restoration of the appeal.heard both sides.2. the appeals filed by the appellants were dismissed as withdrawn as the appellants approached the settlement commission in terms of section 32pa of central excise act. now the settlement commission vide order dated 7-9-2001 decided to send back the case under section 32l of the central excise act and gave permission to the appellants to ask for restoration of the appeals in terms of provisions of sub-section (7) of section 32pa of the central excise act.3. as the appeals were withdrawn to approach the settlement commission and now the settlement commission has decided to send the matter back.therefore, the appeals are restored to their original number and adjourned to 13-5-2002 for arguments.

Full Judgment

1. The applicants filed this application for restoration of the appeal.

Heard both sides.

2. The appeals filed by the appellants were dismissed as withdrawn as the appellants approached the Settlement Commission in terms of Section 32PA of Central Excise Act. Now the Settlement Commission vide Order dated 7-9-2001 decided to send back the case under Section 32L of the Central Excise Act and gave permission to the appellants to ask for restoration of the appeals in terms of provisions of sub-section (7) of Section 32PA of the Central Excise Act.

3. As the appeals were withdrawn to approach the Settlement Commission and now the Settlement Commission has decided to send the matter back.

Therefore, the appeals are restored to their original number and adjourned to 13-5-2002 for arguments.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial