Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Cce Vs. Comet Tapes Pvt. Ltd.

Cce vs Comet Tapes Pvt. Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Jan 09, 2002
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/27181

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Excise

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Excise

Key legal issue
Excise

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Cce

Respondent

Comet Tapes Pvt. Ltd.

Legal References

Reported In
(2002)(102)LC883Tri(Mum.)bai

Excerpt

1. this is an appeal filed by the department against the decision of the commissioner (appeals), mumbai-iii. in view of the order is as granting modvat credit under rule 57q in respect of tanks used for storing coal and mixture of adhesive material.2. in this case, the respondent assessee is manufacturing b.o.p.p.tapes for manufacturing the final product. the assessee has to store mixture of the emulsion before producing the final product.3. they claimed modvat credit as they stored the excised goods in respect of such storage tanks. this was not granted by the asst.commissioner of c.ex., kalyan-i dn. by the order of the tribunal dated 8th february, 1999. this was affirmed by the commissioner (appeals) by the impugned order. against this order the department has filed the instant appeals. one of the grounds of the appeal is eligibility of credit in respect of the storage tanks. the product should be recognised as excisable goods and should fall under the category of goods specified against sr. no. 1 to 4 of the table to rule 57q. in my view that argument cannot be accepted because the decision of the tribunal in the following two cases.here the two members who were hearing the appeals had held that such storage tanks is eligible for modvat credit under rule 57q of the central excise rules. following the same i confirm the order of the commissioner (appeals) and dismiss the department's appeal.

Full Judgment

1. This is an appeal filed by the Department against the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals), Mumbai-III. In view of the order is as granting modvat credit under Rule 57Q in respect of Tanks used for storing coal and mixture of adhesive material.

2. In this case, the respondent assessee is manufacturing B.O.P.P.Tapes for manufacturing the final product. The assessee has to store mixture of the emulsion before producing the final product.

3. They claimed modvat credit as they stored the excised goods in respect of such storage tanks. This was not granted by the Asst.

Commissioner of C.Ex., Kalyan-I Dn. by the order of the Tribunal dated 8th February, 1999. This was affirmed by the Commissioner (Appeals) by the impugned order. Against this order the Department has filed the instant appeals. One of the grounds of the appeal is eligibility of credit in respect of the storage tanks. The product should be recognised as excisable goods and should fall under the category of goods specified against Sr. No. 1 to 4 of the table to Rule 57Q. In my view that argument cannot be accepted because the decision of the Tribunal in the following two cases.

Here the two members who were hearing the appeals had held that such storage tanks is eligible for modvat credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules. Following the same I confirm the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) and dismiss the Department's appeal.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial