Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Commissioner of Central Excise, Vs. Doshi Engineering Works

Commissioner of Central Excise, vs Doshi Engineering Works

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Nov 02, 2001
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/26528

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided On
Subject
Excise

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Excise

Key legal issue
Excise

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Commissioner of Central Excise,

Respondent

Doshi Engineering Works

Excerpt

1. the appeal is against the order of the commissioner (appeals) holding that the respondent was entitled to modvat credit on the basis of various documents. these consist of three invoices-cum-challan issued by steel authority of india (sail for short) for goods delivered from its depot and nine documents issued by others. the objection to the documents issued by sail was that it was not acceptable after 30.6.1994 by virtue of notification 16/94. the notice contended that janson trading co. and s.c. industrial syndicate were unregistered. the invoice issued by indian oxygen corporation ltd. was not valid after 4.7.1994 by virtue of notification 33/94. another six invoices issued by s.c. industrial syndicate were not in the prescribed proforma and do not give details as specified in notification 33/94. in his order, the commissioner (appeals) has found the invoices issued by sail to be valid by virtue of the amendment by notification 21/94. he finds the invoices of bombay oxygen corporation ltd. and s.c. industrial syndicate, who have been subsequently registered as provided by law and that other invoices contained the relevant particulars.2. the department's appeal does not specifically question any of the finding of the commissioner (appeals). it only emphasises that the relevant details have not been specified in the invoices. when the commissioner (appeals) has found that the details were specified in the invoices it was necessary for the appeal to point out with regard to in which invoices and what particulars his finding was incorrect. it was easy enough for the appellant to give such details. there is however not the slightest attempt to do so. in the absence of these particulars in the appeal, i do not find enough material to interfere with the order of the commissioner (appeals).

Full Judgment

1. The appeal is against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) holding that the respondent was entitled to modvat credit on the basis of various documents. These consist of three invoices-cum-challan issued by Steel Authority of India (SAIL for short) for goods delivered from its depot and nine documents issued by others. The objection to the documents issued by SAIL was that it was not acceptable after 30.6.1994 by virtue of notification 16/94. The notice contended that Janson Trading Co. and S.C. Industrial Syndicate were unregistered. The invoice issued by Indian Oxygen Corporation Ltd. was not valid after 4.7.1994 by virtue of notification 33/94. Another six invoices issued by S.C. Industrial Syndicate were not in the prescribed proforma and do not give details as specified in notification 33/94. In his order, the Commissioner (Appeals) has found the invoices issued by SAIL to be valid by virtue of the amendment by notification 21/94. He finds the invoices of Bombay Oxygen Corporation Ltd. and S.C. Industrial Syndicate, who have been subsequently registered as provided by law and that other invoices contained the relevant particulars.

2. The department's appeal does not specifically question any of the finding of the Commissioner (Appeals). It only emphasises that the relevant details have not been specified in the invoices. When the Commissioner (Appeals) has found that the details were specified in the invoices it was necessary for the appeal to point out with regard to in which invoices and what particulars his finding was incorrect. It was easy enough for the appellant to give such details. There is however not the slightest attempt to do so. In the absence of these particulars in the appeal, I do not find enough material to interfere with the order of the Commissioner (Appeals).

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial