Commissioner of Central Excise, Vs. Lans Metal Pvt. Ltd.

Commissioner of Central Excise, vs Lans Metal Pvt. Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Oct 30, 2001

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/26424

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/26424
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided On: Oct 30, 2001
Subject: MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue: MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Commissioner of Central Excise,

Respondent

Lans Metal Pvt. Ltd.

Excerpt

1. the issue in this case relates to the eligibility of gum tape used as packing material by the respondents who are manufacturers of aluminium collapsible tubes, to modvat credit.2. on hearing the ld. dr and perusing the written submissions filed before me on the ground that the respondent that they are entitled to modvat credit since the tribunal in the case of hindustan lever ltd. v.collector of central excise, calcutta-ii [1994 (70) elt 595 (tribunal)] has held that gum tape is eligible for modvat credit and this decision of the tribunal has been followed subsequently, following the ratio of the above decision i hold that modvat credit is available to the respondents or gum tape used by them for packing their final products, i uphold the impugned order and reject the appeal of the revenue.

Full Judgment

1. The issue in this case relates to the eligibility of Gum Tape used as packing material by the respondents who are manufacturers of Aluminium Collapsible Tubes, to modvat credit.

2. On hearing the Ld. DR and perusing the written submissions filed before me on the ground that the respondent that they are entitled to modvat credit since the Tribunal in the case of Hindustan Lever Ltd. v.Collector of Central Excise, Calcutta-II [1994 (70) ELT 595 (Tribunal)] has held that Gum Tape is eligible for modvat credit and this decision of the Tribunal has been followed subsequently, following the ratio of the above decision I hold that modvat credit is available to the respondents or gum tape used by them for packing their final products, I uphold the impugned order and reject the appeal of the Revenue.

Same Court & Year Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumb... Same Parties Commissioner of Central Excise, vs Lans Metal Pvt. Ltd. Same Subject MRTP