Full Judgment
2. The representative of the applicant contends that the entire amount has been paid. The amount of credit has been repaid and the applicant is entitled to the amnesty scheme. However the letter of the applicant to the Commissioner itself indicates that only part has been paid.
Prima facie therefore merits of the case are against the applicant.
However on the ground of financial hardship since the applicant is closed and has incurred losses of Rs. 14 crores in the period from 1998, we waive deposit of the duty and penalty and stay their recovery.