Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Commissioner of Central Excise, Vs. Baheti Metal and Ferro Alloys

Commissioner of Central Excise, vs Baheti Metal and Ferro Alloys

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Sep 10, 2001
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/25541

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided On
Subject
Excise

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Excise

Key legal issue
Excise

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Commissioner of Central Excise,

Respondent

Baheti Metal and Ferro Alloys

Excerpt

1. the application for early hearing has been filed by the revenue on the ground that stakes to the extent of over rs. 53 lakhs are involved.the appeal is of the year 1999 and the amount involved does not warrant jumping the queue. hence, we dismiss the present application. either side is at liberty to move appropriate application for transfer of the case to cegat, delhi.

Full Judgment

1. The application for early hearing has been filed by the Revenue on the ground that stakes to the extent of over Rs. 53 lakhs are involved.

The appeal is of the year 1999 and the amount involved does not warrant jumping the queue. Hence, we dismiss the present application. Either side is at liberty to move appropriate application for transfer of the case to CEGAT, Delhi.

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumb... Same Parties Commissioner of Central Excise, vs Baheti Metal and Ferro Alloys Same Subject Excise
Excise

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales