Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Manager, Regency Express, Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Prev.),

Manager, Regency Express, vs Commissioner of Customs (Prev.),

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta Decided Sep 04, 2001
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/25387

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Decided On
Subject
Customs

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Customs

Key legal issue
Customs

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Manager, Regency Express,

Respondent

Commissioner of Customs (Prev.),

Excerpt

1. vide the impugned order, the commissioner(appeals) has dismissed the appellants' appeals for non-compliance with the provisions of section 129e of customs act, 1962 without first passing the order on the stay petition filed by the applicants/appellants along with appeals.accordingly, i set aside the impugned order and remand the matters to the commissioner(appeals) with directions to first decide the stay petitions and then pass orders on the appeals filed by the appellants.appeals thus allowed by way of remand. stay petitions also get disposed of.

Full Judgment

1. Vide the impugned Order, the Commissioner(Appeals) has dismissed the appellants' appeals for non-compliance with the provisions of Section 129E of Customs Act, 1962 without first passing the Order on the Stay petition filed by the applicants/appellants along with appeals.

Accordingly, I set aside the impugned Order and remand the matters to the Commissioner(Appeals) with directions to first decide the Stay petitions and then pass Orders on the appeals filed by the appellants.

Appeals thus allowed by way of remand. Stay petitions also get disposed of.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial