Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Garlick Engineering Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Garlick Engineering vs Commissioner of Central Excise,

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Aug 24, 2001
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/25180

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided On
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Garlick Engineering

Respondent

Commissioner of Central Excise,

Excerpt

1. when the appeal was called out shri m.n. koparkar, manager (accounts) of the appellant company placed on record photocopies of the immunity granted by the commissioner of central excise, mumbai-iii in terms of the kvss rules, 1998. i have examined the papers and i find that they relate to the impugned order. in view of the assessee having achieved satisfaction the present appeal becomes infructuous and is thus dismissed.

Full Judgment

1. When the appeal was called out Shri M.N. Koparkar, Manager (Accounts) of the appellant company placed on record photocopies of the immunity granted by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-III in terms of the KVSS Rules, 1998. I have examined the papers and I find that they relate to the impugned order. In view of the assessee having achieved satisfaction the present appeal becomes infructuous and is thus dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial