Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Johnson and Johnson Limited Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Johnson and Johnson Limited vs Commissioner of C. Ex.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Aug 11, 2001
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/24967

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided On
Subject
Labour and Industrial

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Labour and Industrial

Key legal issue
Labour and Industrial

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Johnson and Johnson Limited

Respondent

Commissioner of C. Ex.

Legal References

Reported In
(2002)(140)ELT481Tri(Mum.)bai

Excerpt

1. the application is for waiver of pre-deposit of rs. 4,19,032/- confirmed as duty on magnical tablets manufactured by the applicant herein as a result of classifying the product under sub-heading 2108.99 as "other miscellaneous edible food preparations", rejecting the applicant's claim for classification as p&p medicines under sub-heading 3003.10, and imposing penalty of rs. 1 lakh.3. the contention of the applicant that the item in question is used to prevent pre-eclampsia which leads to hypertension and swelling of feet in pregnant and lactating women and that the tablets are also used for prevention of vitamin-d deficiency and prevents premature labour, that it is sold under prescription and that it is not commonly available but available only in chemist's shop, etc. has not been rebutted by the revenue. the revenue rests its case upon the fact that the composition of the item namely, zinc, calcium and magnesium are not such as to make the item a p&p medicine but only a sort of food supplement. having regard to the language of the rival heading and the fact that the item is only sold under prescription, prima facie, it is a prophylactic and therefore heading 30.03, prima facie, appears more appropriate and therefore we waive deposit of the duty and penalty, and stay recovery thereof pending the appeal.

Full Judgment

1. The application is for waiver of pre-deposit of Rs. 4,19,032/- confirmed as duty on magnical tablets manufactured by the applicant herein as a result of classifying the product under sub-heading 2108.99 as "other miscellaneous edible food preparations", rejecting the applicant's claim for classification as P&P medicines under sub-heading 3003.10, and imposing penalty of Rs. 1 lakh.

3. The contention of the applicant that the item in question is used to prevent pre-eclampsia which leads to hypertension and swelling of feet in pregnant and lactating women and that the tablets are also used for prevention of Vitamin-D deficiency and prevents premature labour, that it is sold under prescription and that it is not commonly available but available only in chemist's shop, etc. has not been rebutted by the Revenue. The Revenue rests its case upon the fact that the composition of the item namely, zinc, calcium and magnesium are not such as to make the item a P&P medicine but only a sort of food supplement. Having regard to the language of the rival heading and the fact that the item is only sold under prescription, prima facie, it is a prophylactic and therefore Heading 30.03, prima facie, appears more appropriate and therefore we waive deposit of the duty and penalty, and stay recovery thereof pending the appeal.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial