Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. vs Commissioner of Central Excise

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Jul 23, 2001
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/24607

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided On
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd.

Respondent

Commissioner of Central Excise

Excerpt

1. the representative of the appellant says that the clearance of the committee of secretaries still has not been issued and has no information about the present status of the proceedings.2. in these circumstances we dismiss the appeal for non-compliance, giving the appellant liberty to revive if and when such clearance is received.

Full Judgment

1. The representative of the appellant says that the clearance of the Committee of Secretaries still has not been issued and has no information about the present status of the proceedings.

2. In these circumstances we dismiss the appeal for non-compliance, giving the appellant liberty to revive if and when such clearance is received.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial