Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Maniyar Plast Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Maniyar Plast Ltd. vs Commissioner of Central Excise,

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Jul 23, 2001
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/24604

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided On
Subject
Excise

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Excise

Key legal issue
Excise

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Maniyar Plast Ltd.

Respondent

Commissioner of Central Excise,

Excerpt

1. the sole ground advances by the counsel for the applicant for waiving deposit of duty of rs 2.95 crores approx, and a penalty or rs. 1.48 crores approx is financial hardship. the application filed by the applicant to the board of industrial and financial reconstruction in march 2000, has been registered under section 20 of the sick industries companies (special provisions) act, 1985. it is on this basis that the tribunal in its order in navpad textile industries ltd & other vs cce, surat i in applications 2711 to 2713 we waived deposit of the duty demanded from maniyar plast ltd. the counsel for the applicant makes a statement before that the position between passing of that order and now so far as the applicant is concerned continues unchanged.2. accordingly, we waive deposit of the duty and penalty and stay their recovery.

Full Judgment

1. The sole ground advances by the counsel for the applicant for waiving deposit of duty of Rs 2.95 crores approx, and a penalty or Rs. 1.48 crores approx is financial hardship. The application filed by the applicant to the Board of Industrial and Financial Reconstruction in March 2000, has been registered under section 20 of the Sick Industries Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985. It is on this basis that the Tribunal in its order in Navpad textile Industries Ltd & other vs CCE, Surat I in applications 2711 to 2713 we waived deposit of the duty demanded from Maniyar Plast Ltd. The counsel for the applicant makes a statement before that the position between passing of that order and now so far as the applicant is concerned continues unchanged.

2. Accordingly, we waive deposit of the duty and penalty and stay their recovery.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial