Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Commissioner of Central Excise, Vs. M/S. Steel Strips and Wheels Ltd.

Commissioner of Central Excise, vs M/S. Steel Strips and Wheels Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Jun 25, 2001
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/24027

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided On
Subject
Excise

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Excise

Key legal issue
Excise

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Commissioner of Central Excise,

Respondent

M/S. Steel Strips and Wheels Ltd.

Excerpt

1. the revenue filed this application for stay of operation of the impugned order.3. in the impugned order the benefit of modvat credit was allowed to the respondents. taking into facts and circumstances of the case, i find no merit in the application. the application. the application is rejected. however, the registry is directed to fix the appeal for arguments on 17.9.2001.

Full Judgment

1. The Revenue filed this application for stay of operation of the impugned order.

3. In the impugned order the benefit of MODVAT credit was allowed to the respondents. Taking into facts and circumstances of the case, I find no merit in the application. The application. The application is rejected. However, the Registry is directed to fix the appeal for arguments on 17.9.2001.

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delh... Same Parties Commissioner of Central Excise, vs M/S. Steel Strips and Whee... Same Subject Excise
Excise

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales