Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Eden Textronics Vs. Commissioner of Cen. Excise,

Eden Textronics vs Commissioner of Cen. Excise,

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Jun 14, 2001
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/23796

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided On
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Eden Textronics

Respondent

Commissioner of Cen. Excise,

Excerpt

1. an application for stay and waiver of payment of penalty of rs. 12 lakh has been filed and posted for hearing today.2. fact of the case are that the applicants are engaged in the manufacture of man-mad fabrics and cotton fabrics falling under chapters 52, 54 and 55 of the central excise tariff act. the applicants' case fall within the purview of rule 96 zq of the cental excise rules read with section 3a of the central excise act. it appears that for the month of april and may, 99 there was a delay for payment of duty by 4 days in respect of april, 1999 and 2 days in respect of may, 1999. the applicants plead before us that as far as april, 99 is concerned, the applicants were expecting certain money from the department towards abatement. the said sum did not get paid within the expected time. therefore, there was some delay in payment of the duty.as far as may, 99 is concerned, the document available with the assessee in the form of letter written by the applicants' advocate indicate that on 14.5.99, the amount has been credited with the bankers of the department viz. bank of maharashtra. therefore, it is pleaded that there was no delay in making payment. the applicants, therefore, pleads before us for granting stay and waiver of payment of the amount.3. we have considered the rival submissions made before us by the id.advocate for the applicants as well as by the id. departmental representative. the facts requires certain deeper study and consideration which will be done at the time of final disposal.however, for the purpose of hearing the appeal, we direct the applicants to deposit a sum of rs. 50,000/-(rupees fifty thousand) within one month from the date of receipt of this order. on such payment being made, there shall be waiver of payment of remaining sum of penalty and stay the recovery thereof.

Full Judgment

1. An application for stay and waiver of payment of penalty of Rs. 12 lakh has been filed and posted for hearing today.

2. Fact of the case are that the applicants are engaged in the manufacture of man-mad fabrics and cotton fabrics falling under Chapters 52, 54 and 55 of the Central Excise Tariff Act. The applicants' case fall within the purview of Rule 96 ZQ of the Cental Excise Rules read with section 3A of the Central Excise Act. It appears that for the month of April and May, 99 there was a delay for payment of duty by 4 days in respect of April, 1999 and 2 days in respect of May, 1999. The applicants plead before us that as far as April, 99 is concerned, the applicants were expecting certain money from the department towards abatement. The said sum did not get paid within the expected time. Therefore, there was some delay in payment of the duty.

As far as May, 99 is concerned, the document available with the assessee in the form of letter written by the applicants' advocate indicate that on 14.5.99, the amount has been credited with the bankers of the department viz. Bank of Maharashtra. Therefore, it is pleaded that there was no delay in making payment. The applicants, therefore, pleads before us for granting stay and waiver of payment of the amount.

3. We have considered the rival submissions made before us by the Id.

advocate for the applicants as well as by the Id. departmental representative. The facts requires certain deeper study and consideration which will be done at the time of final disposal.

However, for the purpose of hearing the appeal, we direct the applicants to deposit a sum of Rs. 50,000/-(Rupees fifty thousand) within one month from the date of receipt of this order. On such payment being made, there shall be waiver of payment of remaining sum of penalty and stay the recovery thereof.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial