Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Swaraj Mazda Vs. C.C.E. Chandigarh

Swaraj Mazda vs C.C.E. Chandigarh

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided May 10, 2001
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/22930

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided On
Subject
Excise

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Excise

Key legal issue
Excise

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Swaraj Mazda

Respondent

C.C.E. Chandigarh

Legal References

Reported In
(2000)(125)ELT959TriDel

Excerpt

1. in this case total amount of credit of rs.5,12,450/- has been disallowed to the appellants who are manufacturer of motor vehicles.out of the above amount rs. 1,61,931/- has been disallowed on the ground that credit was taken on the strength of endorsed gate pass which are not valid for the purpose of taking credit and remaining amount of rs. 3,55,519/- has been disallowed for the reason that invoice on the basis of which credit was taken did not contain the particulars such as rate of duty, amount of duty etc. as required under notification no. 15/94 and 21/94.2. on hearing both sides, i agree with ld. counsel that credit of rs. 1,61,931/- is admissible, in view of the order on reference application of the hon'ble gujrat high court in the case of commissioner of central excise ahmedabad vs gujrat medicraft 2001(42) rlt 475 wherein the high court has held that credit taken on gate pass issued before 1.4.94 and endorsed between 1.4.94 and 30.6.94 is admissible. regarding remaining amount i accept the ld. counsel's plea that defects in the invoice are curable defects. the matter is remanded for rectification of defects and credit is to be extended on satisfaction of the authorities on verification of the invoice. i order accordingly.

Full Judgment

1. In this case total amount of credit of Rs.5,12,450/- has been disallowed to the appellants who are manufacturer of motor vehicles.

Out of the above amount Rs. 1,61,931/- has been disallowed on the ground that credit was taken on the strength of endorsed gate pass which are not valid for the purpose of taking credit and remaining amount of Rs. 3,55,519/- has been disallowed for the reason that invoice on the basis of which credit was taken did not contain the particulars such as rate of duty, amount of duty etc. as required under Notification No. 15/94 and 21/94.

2. On hearing both sides, I agree with Ld. Counsel that credit of Rs. 1,61,931/- is admissible, in view of the order on reference application of the Hon'ble Gujrat High Court in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise Ahmedabad Vs Gujrat Medicraft 2001(42) RLT 475 wherein the High Court has held that credit taken on gate pass issued before 1.4.94 and endorsed between 1.4.94 and 30.6.94 is admissible. Regarding remaining amount I accept the Ld. Counsel's plea that defects in the invoice are curable defects. The matter is remanded for rectification of defects and credit is to be extended on satisfaction of the authorities on verification of the invoice. I order accordingly.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial