Voltas Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and

Voltas Limited vs Commissioner of Central Excise and

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided May 04, 2001

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/22845

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/22845
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided On: May 04, 2001
Subject: MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue: MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Voltas Limited

Respondent

Commissioner of Central Excise and

Legal References

Reported In: (2002)(147)ELT531Tri(Mum.)bai

Excerpt

1. appellant absent and unrepresented despite notice. there is no response to the notice of hearing under rule 11 asking for legible copies of the order-in-original and order-in-appeal.

Full Judgment

1. Appellant absent and unrepresented despite notice. There is no response to the notice of hearing under Rule 11 asking for legible copies of the order-in-original and order-in-appeal.

Same Court & Year Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumb... Same Parties Voltas Limited vs Commissioner of Central Excise and Same Subject MRTP