Commissioner of Central Excise, Vs. M/S. Mohan Meakins Ltd.

Commissioner of Central Excise, vs M/S. Mohan Meakins Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided May 02, 2001

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/22686

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/22686
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided On: May 02, 2001
Subject: MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue: MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Commissioner of Central Excise,

Respondent

M/S. Mohan Meakins Ltd.

Excerpt

1. the commissioner disposed of 4 orders-in-original vide a common order. aggrieved by the order of the lower appellate authority, the revenue filed a consolidated appeal against all 4 orders-in-original which were disposed of by the appellate order, within the statutory period of limitation. since the practice in the tribunal is that as many appeals as there are orders-in-original have to be filed, the revenue has filed separate appeals for which they (sic) of delay in filing.2. learned consultant, shri k.l. rekhi fairly leaves the matter of condonation of delay for decision by the bench.3. in view of the above, i condone the delay in filing the supplementary appeals. all the appeals shall be listed for hearing in due course.

Full Judgment

1. The Commissioner disposed of 4 Orders-in-Original vide a common order. Aggrieved by the order of the lower appellate authority, the Revenue filed a consolidated appeal against all 4 orders-in-original which were disposed of by the appellate order, within the statutory period of limitation. Since the practice in the Tribunal is that as many appeals as there are Orders-in-original have to be filed, the Revenue has filed Separate appeals for which they (sic) of delay in filing.

2. Learned Consultant, Shri K.L. Rekhi fairly leaves the matter of condonation of delay for decision by the Bench.

3. In view of the above, I condone the delay in filing the supplementary appeals. All the appeals shall be listed for hearing in due course.

Same Court & Year Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delh... Same Parties Commissioner of Central Excise, vs M/S. Mohan Meakins Ltd. Same Subject MRTP