Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Comissioner of Central Excise, Vs. M/S. Blast Carboblocks

Comissioner of Central Excise, vs M/S. Blast Carboblocks

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Apr 26, 2001
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/22510

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided On
Subject
Excise

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Excise

Key legal issue
Excise

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Comissioner of Central Excise,

Respondent

M/S. Blast Carboblocks

Excerpt

1. the appeal filed by revenue was rejected on a number of grounds. the commissioner has now applied for restoration of the appeal. on the required documents being presented, the appeal is restored to its original number.

Full Judgment

1. The appeal filed by revenue was rejected on a number of grounds. The Commissioner has now applied for restoration of the appeal. On the required documents being presented, the appeal is restored to its original number.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial