Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Commissioner of Central Excise and Vs. M/S. Saico Engg. and Fabricators

Commissioner of Central Excise and vs M/S. Saico Engg. and Fabricators

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Apr 20, 2001
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/22353

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided On
Subject
Excise

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Excise

Key legal issue
Excise

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Commissioner of Central Excise and

Respondent

M/S. Saico Engg. and Fabricators

Excerpt

1. the amount involved in this appeal is less than rs. 50,000/- only of modvat claim. in exercise of powers given to me in terms of second proviso to section 35b of the central excise act, 1944, i dismiss the appeal.

Full Judgment

1. The amount involved in this appeal is less than Rs. 50,000/- only of modvat claim. In exercise of powers given to me in terms of second proviso to Section 35B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, I dismiss the appeal.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial