Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

M/S. Bubble Colour Printers Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Trichy

M/S. Bubble Colour Printers vs Commissioner of Customs, Trichy

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu Decided Apr 16, 2001
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/22166

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided On
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

M/S. Bubble Colour Printers

Respondent

Commissioner of Customs, Trichy

Excerpt

1. when the matter was called none appeared for the appellants. they have not reported compliance of stay order no.20/2001 dt.5.1.2001. they were required to pre deposit rs.1 lakh.2. ld. dr submits that they have not received any information pertaining to the compliance of the stay order. he prays for dismissal of the appeal under section 129-e of the customs act, 1962 for non compliance.3. considered. in view of the non compliance of the stay order, the appeal is dismissed in terms of the section 129 e of the customs act, 1962.

Full Judgment

1. When the matter was called none appeared for the Appellants. They have not reported compliance of Stay order No.20/2001 dt.5.1.2001. They were required to pre deposit Rs.1 lakh.

2. Ld. DR submits that they have not received any information pertaining to the compliance of the stay order. He prays for dismissal of the appeal under Section 129-E of the Customs Act, 1962 for non compliance.

3. Considered. In view of the non compliance of the stay order, the Appeal is dismissed in terms of the Section 129 E of the Customs Act, 1962.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial