Commissioner of Central Excise, Vs. M/S. Amrit Dye Chem Inds.

Commissioner of Central Excise, vs M/S. Amrit Dye Chem Inds.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Mar 12, 2001

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/21375

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/21375
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided On: Mar 12, 2001
Subject: Excise

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Excise

Key legal issue: Excise

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Commissioner of Central Excise,

Respondent

M/S. Amrit Dye Chem Inds.

Excerpt

1. the authorisation given by the commissioner to file the appeal was filed in the photostat form. directions were made to file the original copy of the authorisation dated 19.4.99. when the case was called out today, i find that the commissioner has signed a fresh authorisation on 27.2.01. this is not in terms of the directions made. if this authorisation is taken on record, then the format of the appeal in the form 'a' will have to be changed and the revenue will have to file an application for condonation of delay. it appears that the ld.commissioner had not understood the directions made. time is given upto 24.4.01 to correct the error pointed out. posted for compliance on 30.4.01 with a caution that the appeal may be dismissed in the case of non compliance.

Full Judgment

1. The authorisation given by the Commissioner to file the appeal was filed in the photostat form. Directions were made to file the original copy of the authorisation dated 19.4.99. When the case was called out today, I find that the Commissioner has signed a fresh authorisation on 27.2.01. This is not in terms of the directions made. If this authorisation is taken on record, then the format of the appeal in the form 'A' will have to be changed and the Revenue will have to file an application for condonation of delay. It appears that the ld.Commissioner had not understood the directions made. Time is given upto 24.4.01 to correct the error pointed out. Posted for compliance on 30.4.01 with a caution that the appeal may be dismissed in the case of non compliance.

Same Court & Year Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumb... Same Parties Commissioner of Central Excise, vs M/S. Amrit Dye Chem Inds. Same Subject Excise