M/S. Triveni Structural Vs. C.C.E. Allahabad

M/S. Triveni Structural vs C.C.E. Allahabad

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Feb 22, 2001

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/21039

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/21039
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided On: Feb 22, 2001
Subject: MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue: MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

M/S. Triveni Structural

Respondent

C.C.E. Allahabad

Excerpt

1. the appellant in their stay petition as well as in the appal have contended that they are a govt. of india undertaking.they have therefore, to produce clearances from the committee of secretaries of the govt. of india to prosecute their appeal. the matter is being adjourned time and again on last 4 occasions at the request of the appellants.2. when the matter is called the appellants are not represented. there is no request from them either asking for adjournment or giving reasons for their absence.their appeal is therefore, dismissed subject to restoration on their filing clearance from committee of secretaries for prosecuting this appeal.

Full Judgment

1. The appellant in their stay petition as well as in the appal have contended that they are a Govt. of India undertaking.They have therefore, to produce clearances from the Committee of Secretaries of the Govt. of India to prosecute their appeal. The matter is being adjourned time and again on last 4 occasions at the request of the appellants.

2. When the matter is called the appellants are not represented. There is no request from them either asking for adjournment or giving reasons for their absence.Their appeal is therefore, dismissed subject to restoration on their filing clearance from Committee of Secretaries for prosecuting this appeal.

Same Court & Year Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delh... Same Parties M/S. Triveni Structural vs C.C.E. Allahabad Same Subject MRTP