Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Commissioner of Central Excise, Vs. M/S. Inder Singh and Sons

Commissioner of Central Excise, vs M/S. Inder Singh and Sons

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Jan 12, 2001
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/20377

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided On
Subject
Excise

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Excise

Key legal issue
Excise

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Commissioner of Central Excise,

Respondent

M/S. Inder Singh and Sons

Excerpt

1. there is a delay of 3 days in filing the above reference application arising out of the final order of the tribunal by which modvat credit was held to be available to the assessees on ms scrap and steel scrap (re-rolled). learned dr states that initially the tribunal's order was accepted by the commissioner, but subsequently, it was directed by the chief commissioner vide his fax dated 6.9.99 to file a reference application, which was received in the registry of the tribunal on 7.9.99, while the last date for filing the application was 4.9.99. no explanation has been given for the delayed direction to file the reference application. since the delay has not been explained at all, let alone satisfactorily explained, i decline to condone the aame. the reference application is, therefore, dismissed as time barred.

Full Judgment

1. There is a delay of 3 days in filing the above reference application arising out of the Final Order of the Tribunal by which modvat credit was held to be available to the assessees on MS scrap and steel scrap (re-rolled). Learned DR states that initially the Tribunal's order was accepted by the Commissioner, but subsequently, it was directed by the Chief Commissioner vide his fax dated 6.9.99 to file a reference application, which was received in the Registry of the Tribunal on 7.9.99, while the last date for filing the application was 4.9.99. No explanation has been given for the delayed direction to file the reference application. Since the delay has not been explained at all, let alone satisfactorily explained, I decline to condone the aame. The reference application is, therefore, dismissed as time barred.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial