Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

C.C.E., Chandigarh Vs. M/S. Packwell Products India

C.C.E., Chandigarh vs M/S. Packwell Products India

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Jan 12, 2001
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/20375

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Excise

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Excise

Key legal issue
Excise

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

C.C.E., Chandigarh

Respondent

M/S. Packwell Products India

Excerpt

1. the applicant filed this reference application for referring the question of law in the hon'ble high court.3. the appeal filed by the revenue was dismissed by the tribunal at the admission stage under rule 35b of the central excise act as the rule 35b provides that the tribunal may in his discretion refuses to admit the appeal where the amount of fine and penalty does not exceed rs. 50,000/- and section 35g of the central excise act provides that a question of law can be referred to the hon'ble high court arising out of an order passed under section 35 c of central excise act. the present order passed by the tribunal is not an order passed under sec.35-c of the act, hence the reference application is dismissed as non-maintainable.

Full Judgment

1. The applicant filed this Reference application for referring the question of law in the Hon'ble High Court.

3. The appeal filed by the revenue was dismissed by the Tribunal at the admission stage under Rule 35B of the Central Excise Act as the Rule 35B provides that the Tribunal may in his discretion refuses to admit the appeal where the amount of fine and penalty does not exceed Rs. 50,000/- and Section 35G of the Central Excise Act provides that a question of law can be referred to the Hon'ble High Court arising out of an order passed under Section 35 C of Central Excise Act. The present order passed by the Tribunal is not an order passed under Sec.

35-C of the Act, hence the reference application is dismissed as non-maintainable.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial