Full Judgment
2. Today when the matter is called, the appellants are not represented.
I have heard Shri R.C. Sankhla, JDR for the Respondent. The appellants have sent a communication dated 18-11-2000 in which it is requested that the Stay Order dated 10-10-2000 may be modified and appeal may be heard without asking for any deposit of the duty. I have considered these submissions. As already stated, the order dated 10-10-2000 for pre-deposit was made in the presence of ld. Advocate of the appellants.
The date of reporting compliance for pre-deposit i.e., 23-11-2000 is also known to the appellants, as the same was declared in the open Court in the presence of ld. Advocate for the appellants. The Stay Order dated 10-10-2000 is a detailed speaking order. On consideration of the submissions of the appellants, I find no grounds to waive the predeposit of the duty amount as already directed. Since the appellants have not carried out the direction of the pre-deposit, their appeal is dismissed under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944.