Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. J.K. Chemicals Ltd.

Commissioner of Central Excise vs J.K. Chemicals Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Aug 16, 2000

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/18931

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/18931
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided On: Aug 16, 2000
Subject: Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue: Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Commissioner of Central Excise

Respondent

J.K. Chemicals Ltd.

Legal References

Reported In: (2000)(121)ELT803Tri(Mum.)bai

Excerpt

1. the appeal was filed by the commissioner of central excise, mumbai-vi. the scrutiny shows that the copies of the order-in-original were not enclosed herewith. several memoranda were sent to the commissioner for correcting the lacuna. ultimately, a notice was sent asking the commissioner why the appeal should not be dismissed. shri choubey, jdr also separately sent a letter on 9-5-2000. in response to the letter, the office of the commissioner of central excise sent one copy of the order-in-original to shri choubey vide letter dated 6-6-2000.2. we are amazed at the lack of knowledge displayed by the appellant commissioner. in spite of several reminders and notice the commisisoner has not ensured the survival of the appeal. the appeal is dismissed under rule 11 of the cegat (procedure) rules, 1982.3. a copy of this order be marked to chief commissioner of central excise, mumbai for his information.

Full Judgment

1. The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-VI. The scrutiny shows that the copies of the Order-in-Original were not enclosed herewith. Several memoranda were sent to the Commissioner for correcting the lacuna. Ultimately, a notice was sent asking the Commissioner why the appeal should not be dismissed. Shri Choubey, JDR also separately sent a letter on 9-5-2000. In response to the letter, the Office of the Commissioner of Central Excise sent one copy of the Order-in-Original to Shri Choubey vide letter dated 6-6-2000.

2. We are amazed at the lack of knowledge displayed by the Appellant Commissioner. In spite of several reminders and notice the Commisisoner has not ensured the survival of the appeal. The appeal is dismissed under Rule 11 of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982.

3. A copy of this order be marked to Chief Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai for his information.

Same Court & Year Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumb... Same Parties Commissioner of Central Excise vs J.K. Chemicals Ltd. Same Subject Right to Information