Mr. Ummer Farooq vs the State

Mr. Ummer Farooq vs The State

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Feb 05, 2024

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1873818

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1873818
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: K.Natarajan
Decided On: Feb 05, 2024
Case Number: CRL.P/1764/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mr. Ummer Farooq

Respondent

The State

Excerpt

.....406, 420, 465, 468, 471 r/w sec.34 of ipc pending on the file of the ist additional civil judge (sr.dn.) and cjm court at mangaluru. in crl.p no.2454/2023 mr. deepak k. vasani s/o late kanthilal r, aged about 55 years, r/at no.18-3-a54/6, vinayaka kripa, n.g.road, opo. athavara, mangaluru - 575 001. …petitioner (by sri. rajarama sooryambail, advocate) -3-1. the state of karnataka represented by ullal police station, represented by spp, w/o ashok kumar, aged about 50 years, shreyash, kadri park, kadri kambala, kadri road, mangalore - 575 004.of cr.p.c. praying to quash the fir in crime no.148/2022 on the file of 1st addl. civil judge and cjm court, mangalore city, mangalore for the offences p/u/s.120b, 406, 420, 465, 468, 471 r/w sec.34 of ipc, and grant such other order or direction as this honble court may be deems fit to grant in thefacts and circumstances of the case.these petitions, coming on for admission, this day, the court made the following:orderlearned counsels for the petitioners in both petitions submit that the police have already filed charge sheet and seek permission of this court to withdraw the petitions with liberty to file a fresh petition challenging the charge sheet. -4-2. permission is granted.3. accordingly, both the criminal petitions are dismissed as withdrawn reserving liberty as prayed for. sd/- judge cs list no.: 1 sl no.: 57 ct:sk

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1764 OF 2023 C/W CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2454 OF 2023 IN CRL.P NO.1764/2023

1. MR. UMMER FAROOQ S/O BAVA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/AT SUNDARI BAGH, MASTHIKATTE, ULLALA VILLAGE, MANGALORE TALUK - 575 020.

2. MR. HARISHCHANDRA S/O MOGAYYA ACHARYA, Digitally signed by AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, VEDAVATHI A K Location: High R/AT VAIDHIYANATHA TEMPLE, Court of Karnataka ROAD ULLAL, ULLAL, MANGALORE CITY MANGALORE - 575 020. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RENSPRE PRITHESH D'SOUZA, ADVOCATE)

1. THE STATE

BY ULLAL POLICE STATION, -2- REPRESENTED BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, W/O ASHOK, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT. SHREYAS KADRI ROCK, KADRI KAMBLA ROAD, MANGALORE - 575 003. OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR AGAINST THE PETITIONER IN CR.NO.148/2022 OF ULLAL P.S., FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S.120-B, 406, 420, 465, 468, 471 R/W SEC.34 OF IPC PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE Ist ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (Sr.Dn.) AND CJM COURT AT MANGALURU. IN CRL.P NO.2454/2023 MR. DEEPAK K. VASANI S/O LATE KANTHILAL R, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT NO.18-3-A54/6, VINAYAKA KRIPA, N.G.ROAD, OPO. ATHAVARA, MANGALURU - 575 001. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAJARAMA SOORYAMBAIL, ADVOCATE) -3-

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ULLAL POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY SPP, W/O ASHOK KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, SHREYASH, KADRI PARK, KADRI KAMBALA, KADRI ROAD, MANGALORE - 575 004.

OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR IN CRIME NO.148/2022 ON THE FILE OF 1ST ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, MANGALORE CITY, MANGALORE FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S.120B, 406, 420, 465, 468, 471 R/W SEC.34 OF IPC, AND GRANT SUCH OTHER ORDER OR DIRECTION AS THIS HONBLE COURT MAY BE DEEMS FIT TO GRANT IN THE

FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE.

THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Learned counsels for the petitioners in both petitions submit that the police have already filed charge sheet and seek permission of this Court to withdraw the petitions with liberty to file a fresh petition challenging the charge sheet. -4-

2. Permission is granted.

3. Accordingly, both the criminal petitions are dismissed as withdrawn reserving liberty as prayed for. Sd/- JUDGE CS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 57 CT:SK

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2024 Same Parties Mr. Ummer Farooq vs The State Same Judge K.Natarajan

Public prosecutor Police Station high court The State