Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Devarajan vs Stae Rep by

Devarajan vs Stae Rep by

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Sep 25, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1858164

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL OP/8516/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Devarajan

Respondent

Stae Rep by

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 25-09-2025coramthe honourable mr justice n. sathish kumar crl op no. 8516 of 2024 & crl.m.p.no.6209 of 20241. devarajan 2.d.venkatesan 3.m.manivasagam 4.p. kandasamy petitioner(s) vs1. state rep bysub inspector of police, ammapet 2.chandrasekaran respondent(s) prayer criminal original petition filed under section 482 of cr.p.c., to call for entire records in connection with c.c.no.726 of 2021 on the file of the judicial magistrate no.5, salem and quash the same in so far as the petitioners are concerned. for petitioner(s): ms.m.pbharathi for respondent(s): mr.vinothraja for r1 government advocate (crl.side) mr.r.abdul mubeen for r2orderwhen the petition is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw the present petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. in view of the submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. index:yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderinternet:yes neutral citation:yes/no ssd to 1.stae rep by sub inspector of police ammapet2. the public prosecutor, high court, madras n.sathish kumar j. ssd crl op no. 8516 of

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 25-09-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR CRL OP No. 8516 of 2024 & Crl.M.P.No.6209 of 2024

1. Devarajan 2.D.Venkatesan 3.M.Manivasagam 4.P. Kandasamy Petitioner(s) Vs

1. State Rep By

Sub Inspector Of Police, Ammapet 2.Chandrasekaran Respondent(s) PRAYER Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to call for entire records in connection with C.C.No.726 OF 2021 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.5, Salem and quash the same in so far as the petitioners are concerned. For Petitioner(s): Ms.M.Pbharathi For Respondent(s): Mr.Vinothraja For R1 Government Advocate (Crl.Side) Mr.R.Abdul Mubeen for R2

ORDER

When the petition is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Index:Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No ssd To 1.Stae Rep By Sub Inspector Of Police Ammapet

2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras N.SATHISH KUMAR J. ssd CRL OP No. 8516 of

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial