Harshitha S vs Manjunath

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jul 26, 2024

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1857757

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1857757
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: H.P.Sandesh
Decided On: Jul 26, 2024
Case Number: RSA/118/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Harshitha S

Respondent

Manjunath

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 26th day of july, 2024 before the hon'ble mr justice h.p.sandesh regular second appeal no.118 of 2022 between: smt. harshitha s @ honnamma w/o k. manjunath aged about 22 years r/at halasinamaradadoddi village bidadi hobli ramanagara taluk and distric-562109 …appellant (by sri b v krishnappa, advocate) and:digitally signed manjunath by devika m s/o honnaiah location: high aged about 30 yearscourt of karnataka r/at kumbapura colony kailancha hobli ramanagara district-562109 …respondent this rsa is filed under section 100 of cpc against the judgment and decree dated 14.09.2021 passed in ra.no.38/2020 on the file of the iii additional district and sesions judge ramanagara and etc. -2- this appeal, coming on for orders, this day,judgment was delivered therein as under:coram: hon'ble mr justice h.p.sandeshoral judgmentthis appeal is of the year 2022. this court on 10.07.2024 taken note that the counsel for the appellant is absent and finally two weeks time was granted to comply with the office objections and also to submit with regard to the maintainability of the appeal and also made it clear that if the counsel for the appellant does not appear on the next date of hearing, the appeal will be dismissed for non-prosecution. inspite of this order, the counsel for the appellant is not pursuing the matter diligently. accordingly, the second appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. sd/- (h.p.sandesh) judge sn

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF JULY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.118 OF 2022 BETWEEN: SMT. HARSHITHA S @ HONNAMMA W/O K. MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS R/AT HALASINAMARADADODDI VILLAGE BIDADI HOBLI RAMANAGARA TALUK AND DISTRIC-562109 …APPELLANT (BY SRI B V KRISHNAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND:
Digitally signed   MANJUNATH
by DEVIKA M        S/O HONNAIAH
Location: HIGH     AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
COURT OF KARNATAKA R/AT KUMBAPURA COLONY KAILANCHA HOBLI RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562109 …RESPONDENT THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 14.09.2021 PASSED IN RA.No.38/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESIONS JUDGE RAMANAGARA AND ETC. -2- THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

ORAL JUDGMENT

This appeal is of the year 2022. This Court on 10.07.2024 taken note that the counsel for the appellant is absent and finally two weeks time was granted to comply with the office objections and also to submit with regard to the maintainability of the appeal and also made it clear that if the counsel for the appellant does not appear on the next date of hearing, the appeal will be dismissed for non-prosecution. Inspite of this order, the counsel for the appellant is not pursuing the matter diligently. Accordingly, the second appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE SN

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2024 Same Parties Harshitha S vs Manjunath Same Judge H.P.Sandesh

high court