Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ramanna vs the State of Karnataka

Ramanna vs The State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Dec 19, 2024
~4 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1855628

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/431/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ramanna

Respondent

The State of Karnataka

Excerpt

.....(ch-5) in cop rvn 37/2021 vide annexure-a dated 24.12.2021 in partly allowing the revision petition,by modifying the order passed by the r2 dated 17.06.2021,on the application filed by the r3,4,5 filed under section 71(3) of k.c.s act,1959,r/w order vii rule 11 along with section 151 of cpc in dispute no.jrb/md/4/2018-19 vide annexure- f1 and etc.this writ petition, coming on for preliminary hearing in ‘b’ group, this day, order was made therein as under: coram: hon'ble mr justice suraj govindarajoral order1. the petitioner is before this court seeking for the following reliefs: a. call for records.b. set aside the order passed by the hon’ble karnataka appellate tribunal at bengaluru (ch-5) in cop.rvn-37/2021 dated 24.12.2021 in partly allowing the revision petition, by modifying theorder passed by the r2 dated: 17.06.2021, on theapplication filed by the respondents no. 3, 4 & 5 filed under section 71(3) of k.c.s act, 1959, r/worder vii rule 11 along with section 151 of cpc indispute no. jrb/md/4/2018-19 vide annexure-a & f1; c. issue any other writ, order or direction and grant such other and further reliefs as this hon’ble court deems fit and proper under the circumstances of this case, in the interest of justice and equity. -4-2. memo dated 19.12.2024 has been filed signed by thepetitioner and the learned counsel for the petitioner which reads as under: memo filed by the petitioner the petitioner in the above case most respectfully submits as follows;1. it is submitted that, the petitioner enrolled as themember of the engineers housing co-operative society ltd., respondent no.3 in the writ petition. the petitioner also deposited a sum of rs. 2,50,000/- with the 3rd respondent in anticipation of the allotment of residential site to him, during 2006. inspite of expiry of all these years, the respondent no.3-society couldn't form approved layout in the lands proposed to be formed a layout in view of the civil disputes pending for.....

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 431 OF 2022 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: RAMANNA S/O LATE AJJEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.463 MIG 11TH A CROSS YELAHANKA NEW TOWN BANGALORE-560064. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIJAY SHETTY B.,ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

REP BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY CO-OPERATIVE DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560001. Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA 2. JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES Location: HIGH BENGALURU REGION COURT OF SAHAKARA SOUDHA NO.146 KARNATAKA 3RD FLOOR, 3RD MAIN 8TH CROSS, MARGOSA ROAD MALLESHWARAM BENGALURU-560003.

3. THE ENGINEERS HOUSING CO-OPERATIVE -2- REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY

4. THE PRESIDENT

5. THE SECRETARY

6. THE HONOURARY SECRETARY (DELETED V/O/D 29.10.2024)

7. T S BHASKAR REDDY S/O SRI T N SONNAPPA REDDY NO.115/A I MAIN ROAD OPPOSITE U A S LAYOUT R M V II STAGE BANGALORE-560094.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. YOGESH D. NAIK., AGA FOR R1 & R2; SRI. CHANDRANNA., ADVOCATE FOR R3-R5; V/O DATED 29.10.2024-R6 DELETED R7- SERVED) -3- THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227

OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE HONBLE KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT BENGALURU (CH-5) IN COP RVN 37/2021 VIDE ANNEXURE-A DATED 24.12.2021 IN PARTLY ALLOWING THE REVISION PETITION,BY MODIFYING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE R2 DATED 17.06.2021,ON THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE R3,4,5 FILED UNDER SECTION 71(3) OF K.C.S ACT,1959,R/W ORDER VII RULE 11 ALONG WITH SECTION 151 OF CPC IN DISPUTE NO.JRB/MD/4/2018-19 VIDE ANNEXURE- F1 AND ETC.

THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

ORAL ORDER

1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a. Call for records.

b. Set aside the order passed by the Hon’ble Karnataka Appellate Tribunal at Bengaluru (CH-5) in COP.RVN-37/2021 dated 24.12.2021 in partly allowing the Revision Petition, by modifying the

order passed by the R2 dated: 17.06.2021, on the

application filed by the respondents No. 3, 4 & 5 filed under Section 71(3) of K.C.S Act, 1959, r/w

order VII Rule 11 along with Section 151 of CPC in

dispute No. JRB/MD/4/2018-19 vide Annexure-A & F1; c. Issue any other writ, order or direction and grant such other and further reliefs as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper under the circumstances of this case, in the interest of justice and equity. -4-

2. Memo dated 19.12.2024 has been filed signed by the

petitioner and the learned counsel for the petitioner which reads as under: MEMO FILED BY THE PETITIONER The petitioner in the above case most respectfully submits as follows;

1. It is submitted that, the petitioner enrolled as the

member of the Engineers Housing Co-operative Society Ltd., Respondent No.3 in the writ petition. The petitioner also deposited a sum of Rs. 2,50,000/- with the 3rd respondent in anticipation of the allotment of residential site to him, during 2006. Inspite of expiry of all these years, the respondent No.3-Society couldn't form approved layout in the lands proposed to be formed a layout in view of the Civil disputes pending for consideration.

2. It is submitted that, in view of challenging the order

dated 17-06-2021, which was of dismissal of the application filed by the respondents No. 1 to 3 herein and the respondent No. 5, which was sought for the dismissal of the main petition itself on maintainability, before the Hon'ble Karnataka Appellate Tribunal, at Bengaluru in COP.RVN- hold that, the prayer made by the petitioner for allotment of site was held to be premature as no layout has been formed by the Respondent No.3-Society. The said order has been challenged by the petitioner by filing the above writ petition.

3. It is submitted that, in view of the delay in forming the

layout and allotment of sites, the petitioner is agreeable to take refund of the sital deposit together with accrued interest and thereby withdrawing the claim for the allotment of site from the Respondent No.3. Accordingly, today the Respondent No.3- Society has paid a sum of Rs. 5,03,000/- to the petitioner herein by way of a Demand Draft bearing No. No. 553922 dated 09-12-2024 drawn on The Karnataka State Co-op. Apex Bank Ltd., Mahalashmipuram branch for an amount of Rs. 5,03,000/-, in favour of the petitioner herein towards the full and final settlement of the refund of sital deposit. -5-

Wherefore, the petitioner herein most respectfully prays that, this Hon'ble Court be pleased to dismiss the Writ Petition as withdrawn in view of the above said settlement, with no orders as to costs, in the interest of justice and equity.

3. Accepting the memo and submission, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE LN List No.: 2

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial