Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Wood Fun Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Wood Fun Ltd. vs Commissioner of Central Excise

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided May 29, 2000
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/18357

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided On
Subject
Excise

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Excise

Key legal issue
Excise

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Wood Fun Ltd.

Respondent

Commissioner of Central Excise

Legal References

Reported In
(2000)(120)ELT495TriDel

Excerpt

1. the applicants filed this application for recalling the tribunal's final order no. 1105/99-b, dated 8-10-1999 whereby the appeal filed by the appellants was dismissed for non-prosecution.3. the contention of the applicants is that their factory was closed and the notice for hearing was received by some chowkidar of the factory and he handed over the notice to the concerned officer after some time. in the meantime, the appeal was dismissed. in view of the reasons explained in the application, the application is allowed and the final order no. 1105/99-b, dated 8-10-1999 is recalled and the appeal is restored to its original number. adjourned to 26-7-2000 for arguments.

Full Judgment

1. The applicants filed this application for recalling the Tribunal's Final Order No. 1105/99-B, dated 8-10-1999 whereby the appeal filed by the appellants was dismissed for non-prosecution.

3. The contention of the applicants is that their factory was closed and the notice for hearing was received by some chowkidar of the factory and he handed over the notice to the concerned officer after some time. In the meantime, the appeal was dismissed. In view of the reasons explained in the application, the application is allowed and the Final Order No. 1105/99-B, dated 8-10-1999 is recalled and the appeal is restored to its original number. Adjourned to 26-7-2000 for arguments.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial