Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Murugesan vs the District Collector

Murugesan vs The District Collector

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Apr 30, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1830849

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/16288/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Murugesan

Respondent

The District Collector

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 30.04.2025coramthe honourable mr.justice n.anand venkatesh murugesan s/o.sonnapa, mig no.560 phase 10, rayakottai road, tamilnadu housing board (tnhb) hosur, petitioner vs respondent(s)writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to make corrections in the udr and in the land survey nos.722/a2 and 743/b, mrigiripalli, mathigiri village, hosur taluk, krishnagiri district and issue patta to the petitioner and the legal heirs of (late) balan by considering the petitioners representation dated 17.2.2025. for petitioner : mr.r.k.gandhi for respondents : mr.p.sathish additional government pleader *****orderthis writ petition has been filed for issue of a writ of mandamus directing the second respondent to deal with the representation made by the petitioner on 17.02.2025, wherein the petitioner is seeking for correction in the udr patta pertaining to the subject property.2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned additional government pleader for the respondents.3. taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the materials placed before this court, there shall be a direction to the second respondent to deal with the representation madeby the petitioner on 17.02.2025 and pass orders on its own merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. the writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. there shall be no order as to costs. neutral citation: yes/no index: yes/nospeaking order/non-speaking ordermk to n.anand venkatesh, j mk

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 30.04.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH MURUGESAN S/o.Sonnapa, Mig No.560 Phase 10, Rayakottai Road, Tamilnadu Housing Board (TNHB) Hosur, Petitioner Vs Respondent(s)

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to make corrections in the UDR and in the land survey Nos.722/A2 and 743/B, Mrigiripalli, Mathigiri Village, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District and issue Patta to the petitioner and the Legal Heirs of (Late) Balan by considering the petitioners representation dated 17.2.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.R.K.Gandhi For Respondents : Mr.P.Sathish Additional Government Pleader *****

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed for issue of a writ of mandamus directing the second respondent to deal with the representation made by the petitioner on 17.02.2025, wherein the petitioner is seeking for correction in the UDR patta pertaining to the subject property.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents.

3. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the materials placed before this Court, there shall be a direction to the second respondent to deal with the representation made

by the petitioner on 17.02.2025 and pass orders on its own merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The Writ Petition is disposed of in the above terms. There shall be no order as to costs. Neutral Citation: Yes/No Index: Yes/no

Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order

mk To N.ANAND VENKATESH, J mk

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2025 Same Parties Murugesan vs The District Collector Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh
In accordance with law Government pleader Speaking order Pertaining to high court legal heir Has been

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales