Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Arjun Lama Vs. Commr. of Customs

Arjun Lama vs Commr. of Customs

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Mar 11, 2000
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/17852

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided On
Subject
MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue
MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Arjun Lama

Respondent

Commr. of Customs

Legal References

Reported In
(2001)(127)ELT764Tri(Mum.)bai

Excerpt

1. when the stay application came up for hearing, the applicant was not present. on the last occasion also he had asked for adjournment. in the appeal memorandum and in the stay application, the prayer made is that the matter be decided on the records available. i proceed to do so.2. the appellant received one yamaha multi track cassette recorder and 2 gitar signal processors by courier from his sister working in dubai.the value initially declared was us $ 100 but later corrected to dhs 2810. the assessable value thus was redetermined from rs. 4,380/- to rs. 31,798/-the goods were confiscated being consumer goods in negative list and also on the ground of misdeclaration. option for redemption for home consumption was given on payment of fine of rs. 31,000/-.penalty of rs. 1,000/- was imposed on the appellant. in the order-in-appeal the fine was reduced to rs. 12,000/-. additional facility was given to re-export the goods on payment of equivalent amount of fine. the appeal is against this order.3. the grounds made are that the goods are not for commercial/trade purpose. it was a gift sent by his sister to the appellant. the appellant had no knowledge of the gift being sent to him and he had no role in the value declaration of the goods.4. considered the submissions. i remit the penalty in its entirety, reduce the fine in liew of confiscation from rs. 12,000/- to rs. 5,000/- (rupees five thousand) and permit reshipment without any fine.

Full Judgment

1. When the stay application came up for hearing, the applicant was not present. On the last occasion also he had asked for adjournment. In the appeal memorandum and in the stay application, the prayer made is that the matter be decided on the records available. I proceed to do so.

2. The appellant received one Yamaha Multi Track Cassette recorder and 2 Gitar Signal Processors by courier from his sister working in Dubai.

The value initially declared was US $ 100 but later corrected to DHS 2810. The assessable value thus was redetermined from Rs. 4,380/- to Rs. 31,798/-The goods were confiscated being consumer goods in Negative list and also on the ground of misdeclaration. Option for redemption for home consumption was given on payment of fine of Rs. 31,000/-.

Penalty of Rs. 1,000/- was imposed on the appellant. In the Order-in-Appeal the fine was reduced to Rs. 12,000/-. Additional facility was given to re-export the goods on payment of equivalent amount of fine. The appeal is against this order.

3. The grounds made are that the goods are not for commercial/trade purpose. It was a gift sent by his sister to the appellant. The appellant had no knowledge of the gift being sent to him and he had no role in the value declaration of the goods.

4. Considered the submissions. I remit the penalty in its entirety, reduce the fine in liew of confiscation from Rs. 12,000/- to Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five thousand) and permit reshipment without any fine.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial