P.N. Sashikumar and 3 ors. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

P.N. Sashikumar and 3 ors. vs Commissioner of Customs

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Feb 16, 2000

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/17688

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/17688
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Judge: J T J.H., G Srinivasan
Decided On: Feb 16, 2000
Subject: Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue: Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

P.N. Sashikumar and 3 ors.

Respondent

Commissioner of Customs

Legal References

Reported In: (2000)(68)ECC662

Excerpt

.....his custody until later removal.shri s.k. vichare in his statement named one sharma who had entrusted the job of removal of gold to him at consideration of rs. 500 per piece. this sharma when traveling as passenger would secrete the gold in the aircraft. he deposed that shri sasikumar, himself and shri rawat would do this operation with patil who was another associate of theirs.he admitted removal of the gold from the aircraft. these bars were given to s.h. patil, shri sasikumar and shri rawat, in their statements corroborated the material facts fully. the brief facts narrated by the commissioner do not indicate the details of the statements of shri sanjay patil if recorded, although in his finding he has referred to such a statement. shri sanjay patil denied the statement of shri vichare.3. the commissioner in the impugned order imposed penalties of rs. 2.5 lakhs on each of the four applicants. they have filed appeals and the present applications seeking waiver of the pre-deposit of the penalty as also stay of recovery thereof.4. in the applications identical prayers are made. on technical grounds the orders of confiscation have been challenged. these gounds would have to be examined in detail at the time of final hearing. today we take note of the submissions made to the effect that all four persons were salaried employees of the indian airlines and that they had been placed under suspension after the detection of the case. only on grounds of financial hardship we take a lenient view and direct each of the four applicants to deposit a sum of rs. 10,000 as the pre-condition to hearing their appeals. this deposit is to be made within 8 weeks from the receipt of this order.

Full Judgment

1. Shri Sulthan Khan the Ld. Counsel submitted that Shri R.G. Merchant, who was to argue the cases is not well and therefore asked for a short adjournment. We find that the case was posted earlier on two occassions namely on 1.9.99 and 3.1.2000, when also the Ld. Counsel did not appear. We therefore proceed to decide these four applications on merits today.

2. The facts of the case in brief are that from the Tool Box of Shri Sasikumar, an employee of Indian Airlines the Customs seized 20 gold bars bearing foreign markings valued at Rs. 10,02,760 at international prices. Sasikumar in his statement claimed that Shri Rawat and Shri Vichare, the other two applicants used to remove contraband gold from the aircraft. Such gold was kept in his custody until later removal.

Shri S.K. Vichare in his statement named one Sharma who had entrusted the job of removal of gold to him at consideration of Rs. 500 per piece. This Sharma when traveling as passenger would secrete the gold in the aircraft. He deposed that Shri Sasikumar, himself and Shri Rawat would do this operation with Patil who was another associate of theirs.

He admitted removal of the gold from the aircraft. These bars were given to S.H. Patil, Shri Sasikumar and Shri Rawat, in their statements corroborated the material facts fully. The brief facts narrated by the Commissioner do not indicate the details of the statements of Shri Sanjay Patil if recorded, although in his finding he has referred to such a statement. Shri Sanjay Patil denied the statement of Shri Vichare.

3. The Commissioner in the impugned order imposed penalties of Rs. 2.5 Lakhs on each of the four applicants. They have filed appeals and the present applications seeking waiver of the pre-deposit of the penalty as also stay of recovery thereof.

4. In the applications identical prayers are made. On technical grounds the orders of confiscation have been challenged. These gounds would have to be examined in detail at the time of final hearing. Today we take note of the submissions made to the effect that all four persons were salaried employees of the Indian Airlines and that they had been placed under suspension after the detection of the case. Only on grounds of financial hardship we take a lenient view and direct each of the four applicants to deposit a sum of Rs. 10,000 as the pre-condition to hearing their appeals. This deposit is to be made within 8 weeks from the receipt of this order.

Same Court & Year Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumb... Same Parties P.N. Sashikumar and 3 ors. vs Commissioner of Customs Same Subject Right to Information Same Judge J T J.H., G Srinivasan