Anandaiah vs State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jul 02, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1761764

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1761764
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: E.S.Indiresh
Decided On: Jul 02, 2025
Case Number: WP/23087/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Anandaiah

Respondent

State of Karnataka

Excerpt

.....assistant director of land records, department of land records, bengaluru-560064 …respondents (by smt.savithramma, learned aga for respondents) this writ petition is filed under articles 226and 227 of the constitution of india praying to a) direct the r4 and r5 to consider the representations submitted by the petitioner on 05/12/2022, 07/06/2023 and 11/07/2023 within a reasonable time which is produced and marked as annexure-h, j and k and etc., this petition, coming on for preliminary hearing, this day, order was made therein as under: coram: hon'ble mr. justice e.s.indireshoral orderheard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. -3-2. the grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is to direct the respondent nos.4 and 5 to consider the representation made by the petitioner herein produced at annexure h, j and k.3. sri.b.ramesh, learned counsel appearing for thepetitioner invited the attention of the court to the order dated 29.01.2020 (annexure-e), passed by the respondent no.2 and submitted that, the genuineness of the grant made in favor of the petitioner has been considered and the respondent no.2 has directed the tahasildar yelahanka taluk, to mutate the name of the petitioner in the revenue records.4. in that view of the matter the respondent nos.4and 5 are directed to consider the representation made by the petitioner herein in the light of the order passed by the special deputy commissioner, bangalore north sub-division, dated 29.01.2020 in case no.rrt (ylk)cr-8/2019-2020 (annexure- e), within an outer limit of three months from the date of receipt of order. -4-5. with these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. sd/- (e.s.indiresh) judge srk list no.: 1 sl no.: 73

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 23087 OF 2023 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: ANANDAIAH, S/O MUNISHAMAPPA, AGED 64 YEARS, R/AT NO.98, 1ST MAIN ROAD, 6TH CROSS, VINAYAKA NAGAR, KATTIGENAHALLI VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, YELAHANKA TALUK, BENGALURU-560063. …PETITIONER (BY SRI.B.RAMESH., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
Digitally signed DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA VIDHANA SOUDHA, Location: HIGH DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU-560001, REP BY ITS SECRETARY.
2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, BEHIND KANDHAYA BHAVAN,
3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER -2- BENGALURU NORTH SUB-DIVISION, KANDHAYA BHAVAN, K.G.ROAD,
4. THE TAHSILDAR YELAHANKA, BENGALURU-560064.
5. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, DEPARTMENT OF LAND RECORDS, BENGALURU-560064 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.SAVITHRAMMA, LEARNED AGA FOR RESPONDENTS) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) DIRECT THE R4 AND R5 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER ON 05/12/2022, 07/06/2023 AND 11/07/2023 WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME WHICH IS PRODUCED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE-H, J AND K AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

ORAL ORDER

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. -3-

2. The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is to direct the respondent Nos.4 and 5 to consider the representation made by the petitioner herein produced at Annexure H, J and K.

3. Sri.B.Ramesh, learned counsel appearing for the

petitioner invited the attention of the Court to the order dated 29.01.2020 (Annexure-E), passed by the respondent No.2 and submitted that, the genuineness of the grant made in favor of the petitioner has been considered and the respondent No.2 has directed the Tahasildar Yelahanka Taluk, to mutate the name of the petitioner in the revenue records.

4. In that view of the matter the respondent Nos.4

and 5 are directed to consider the representation made by the petitioner herein in the light of the order passed by the Special Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore North Sub-Division, dated 29.01.2020 in case No.RRT (YLK)CR-8/2019-2020 (Annexure- E), within an outer limit of three months from the date of receipt of order. -4-

5. With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SRK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 73

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2025 Same Parties Anandaiah vs State of Karnataka Same Judge E.S.Indiresh