Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Indian Refractory Makers Vs. Designated Authority

Indian Refractory Makers vs Designated Authority

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Feb 02, 2000
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/17588

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided On
Subject
MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue
MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Indian Refractory Makers

Respondent

Designated Authority

Legal References

Reported In
(2000)(118)ELT714TriDel

Excerpt

1. this appeal is filed against the preliminary order of the designated authority published in gazette dated 12th june, 1996 in the investigation concerning imports of dead burnt magnesite originating from the people's republic of china. as per the act no appeal lies against the preliminary finding arrived at by the designated authority in an anti dumping investigation. further, the designated authority has notified its final finding in the gazette of govt. of india dated 12-11-1996. against the final findings the same appellant has preferred appeal c/42/97-ad. in these circumstances/ we hold this appeal as non-maintainable. hence it is dismissed.

Full Judgment

1. This appeal is filed against the preliminary order of the Designated Authority published in Gazette dated 12th June, 1996 in the investigation concerning imports of Dead Burnt magnesite originating from the People's Republic of China. As per the Act no appeal lies against the preliminary finding arrived at by the Designated Authority in an anti dumping investigation. Further, the Designated Authority has notified its final finding in the Gazette of Govt. of India dated 12-11-1996. Against the final findings the same appellant has preferred appeal C/42/97-AD. In these circumstances/ we hold this appeal as non-maintainable. Hence it is dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial